<i>Well put.<br /><br />I'm sure there will be a lot less post now and people seeking other places to get relief. If you spend several years on this board then see it crash like this most people can't help from feeling let down. There were several of us that spent a lot of time to render those images that were erased. Just think of all that archived information on Mars etc., Alex left behind that we cant reference.</i><br /><br />The above does a good job describing my own feelings, as well.<br /><br />The issue is not - nor has it ever been - whether we pay for access to these forums or not (though, in a way, we do by providing traffic for the advertising). The relationship between the members and the site was built on trust. We've been entrusted with using the forums responsibly, creatively, socially, in order to establish an electronic community for the discussion of any and all topics, including space and science. And we trust those maintaining these forums to look after the community we've helped to build.<br /><br />The first time Space.com decided to delete older posts left me unhappy - not because it was done, but because of the way it was done. For awhile, it made it difficult for me to trust these forums. But I've always been one to bump up old threads, revive old discussions and dig through the old stuff, mainly because I like to see information on a given topic gathered in just one or two places, easy to find, easy to add to - like Alex's Mars material. A perfect example, since what happens is that it isn't just Alex contributing, but everyone stepping up with links, ideas, comments, building a very interesting and useful resource on Mars.<br /><br />But the bumps also kept what I judged to be interesting and worthwhile threads near the top, so if Space.com ever decided to undertake another purge without telling us, the good stuff would still be there. I see now that I didn't go far enough. After being burned once, I should have begun archiving the better