QuestionAXION GLUON MATTER AS DARK MATTER

Page 3 - Seeking answers about space? Join the Space community: the premier source of space exploration, innovation, and astronomy news, chronicling (and celebrating) humanity's ongoing expansion across the final frontier.

Hello

Classical Motion​

What is your opinion on Transients of condensates.?

Classical Motion

It depends. In which context are you using the term condensate........and the term transients.

Without knowing the structure and motion of an atom, who knows what we are talking about.

The only condensates I know of is for quantum sensors. But I am pretty sure they have nothing to do with bio-condensates....in cells.

When we ionize an atom, it seems to contract, but no one knows why. We have no clue as to the arrangement of the nucleus.........or the structure of ANY atom.

Our standard model is based on the Bohr model. With electrons in orbit. A physical impossibility. And of course our science uses it.

Then we have QM......based on oscillation.......which is only an indirect result of rotation. The rotation of the particles is where the power and the glue for atoms comes from.....oscillation is just a by-product..........and our science is trying to base mass on it.

At this rate, no one will ever understand mass......and without that understanding......all else is conjecture. Just like the last one hundred years.

I use a physical model for mass. Helical particle currents. The electron has about 18 amps. The proton has about 30,000 amps........ALL from the same amount of charge. e.

We have a constant called e. That constant e has a constant length and a constant amount of E field. That e field can be corralled by a velocity that empowers the M field to balance the E field. That is a constant also.....angular c. Linear and propagated c...........has a relative velocity, not a constant one.

The velocity of linear c has never been measured.......only the reflection of it. And that measurement has always been different.

Because light is a flux......and can result in only an average.

To verify the speed of light.......one needs to use one and only one photon. Our science tries the measure a shower head, instead of one drop.

The constant e and the angular constant of c. The angular constant of c is NOT a velocity.......it's an acceleration. A constant force. Much more then a constant speed.

Last edited:

Classical Motion

Harry, what happens when we superposition velocity? When we super position a linear velocity with an angular velocity, what do we get?

We get an acceleration. E = MC2. Do you see that C2 or C squared? That is NOT c times c. That is c times a 90 degree c. It's a perpendicular velocity. The two velocities scissor each other into an angular acceleration. Angular acceleration forms a rotational structure. A ring-type structure. A charge particle. With ONLY selective and quantum rotations. Charge can only rotate at certain diameters or circumferences. Only certain quantum sizes. They are discrete sizes. With discrete energy, motion, levels. This is due to rotational resonance......NOT oscillatory resonance. Electrical rotation resonance is quantum. NOT broadband. This is all due to the constant tangential velocity. In an oscillation the speed changes. From zero to maximum. But with rotation, the speed is constant.

See the difference?

E stands for energy, but what it really stands for is motion. M stands for mass, but what it really means is confined motion. Confined motion expresses itself as inertia. The scissoring does this. Two scissored rotations makes inertia. And if the scissoring is reversed......we get an inertia cancelling dynamic......where one scissor cancels the other.....an anti inertia motion. This is the electron.....the inertia we measure is the difference of the opposing inertias. We can not measure the mass of an electron.....because the two inertias are opposing each other. And makes the electron extremely "light". 99.9% of the universe energy inventory is locked and un-used.....in protons. 99.9% of all energy transferred, in this universe is done with electrons. Because the electron charge can be charged up and then relaxed, because the anti motion, always wants to discard motion. The electron wants to stay empty of motion and energy.....because of the anti inertia motion.

E is energy, which is motion......when motion is confined it expresses inertia and we call it mass. Energy and inertia are PROPERTIES of an entity.......not an entity. Energy and mass are the motion of an entity. If you remove the motion, the energy and mass.....disappears.

When we confine motion(energy), the structure of the charge, spins that motion into a rotation.

The charge structure can catch and confine motion. c motion. The charge catches very fast motion.

Motion not only has velocity, it has duration. The quickest and shortest motions, like xray and gamma, can be caught directly by the particle. Longer durations of motion like light.....can be be caught by atomic dipole structures, which have the length and size to catch these longer durations......like IR heat frequencies. Light and the colors.....from dipoles. Tripoles. Quadpoles, etc.

Harry, don't fall for these modern science fiction theories. Physicality has always been firm and solid mechanics. And will remain so, whether science recognizes it or not.

That said, if you are a student or in school, don't repeat this in your class. It will not be accepted.

And if you ever want to see a real pants pooper(something no one has ever seen).......inject a rectified sine into an antenna, instead of an AC sine. Have your instructor explain that one to you.

DC emission. Both Maxwell and Einstein were wrong about light. Should study Ampere and Weber instead. These two discovered and described relativity decades before Einstein.

Mechanical motional relativity. Interaction duration(Weber). Interaction angle(Ampere). Not spacetime fiction.

Just an opinion of an old decrepit radio mechanic. I hope it made some sense to you.

I'll retire and let you get back to your conversation. Pardon my interruption.

Classical Motion

Just one more small thought. If we took a body of atoms, ionized them, remove or nullify the ionized electrons, leaving repulsive net charged atoms. Cool, shield and settle.....and hopefully the charge(atoms) will reach a positional stability formation.

This aligned formation, as a whole, would be extremely sensitive to external stimuli. Very weak EM. The body of atoms would ripple like a blanket. It would have an amplifying dynamic. And a storage dynamic.

A super sensor. Not just for EM. But physical motion at very small levels could be detected also. Much more sensitive than we have now.

The problem is the temp. So, what if we use another method for alignment, instead of cooling?

Instead of cooling, lets zap the body of atoms into formation with a laser. Align the body. Turn laser off.....and then sample the body for deformity. Deformity from the stimulus we are trying to measure. Rinse and repeat

Quantum digital sampling. I can't wait. I want to see a photon propagate thru that condensate body. And I want to see that ripple.

Hello

Classical Motion​

Condensates
In reference to compaction
normal matter 10^5
Neutron matter 10^17
Quark matter and its composites range from 10^18 to estimate 10^25
Partonic matter and its campsites rough estime10^26 to 10^30
Axion Gluon matter and its composites 10^31 to 10^35

They are Transients,

All have a property.
Dipolar Electromagnetic Vector fields that stop a singularity from forming.

Quark matter composites can form an Event Horizon and mimic the properties of a classical Black Hole.

Hey! it's OK to disagree.

Classical Motion

Alrighty Harry, thanks. Cause I disagree with just about everything. The ONLY one thing that all men have in common is physicality, and we still can't agree on that. Ironic isn't it?

The one thing we all experience the same way, all can see and can't deny.....is argued over. After all this time, it's kinda disappointing we haven't figured it out yet.

And that's because it's either to small to see, or too far to see. Neither can be verified with surety.

Smallness and toofarness seem indistinguishable. And for some reason, we must use foreign physics, not local physics, to explain them. We can't explain the small or the far.

Apparently, the concept of size and distance is very limited by our intellect. Our dominion only goes so far.

Harry Costas

It's OK
and yet I think along a path, that many will disagree.

I keep telling people read as many science papers as possible, and then read more.

Hello

Classical Motion​

Condensates
In reference to compaction
normal matter 10^5
Neutron matter 10^17
Quark matter and its composites range from 10^18 to estimate 10^25
Partonic matter and its campsites rough estime10^26 to 10^30
Axion Gluon matter and its composites 10^31 to 10^35

They are Transients,

All have a property.
Dipolar Electromagnetic Vector fields that stop a singularity from forming.

Quark matter composites can form an Event Horizon and mimic the properties of a classical Black Hole.

Hey! it's OK to disagree.
Harry! By your shorthand given Neutron Star matter compaction Of 10^17, Are you approximating the given Neutron Star Density Range??): "Neutron stars have overall densities of 3.7×10e17 to 5.9×10e17 kg/m3"??
I am trying to reconcile your shorthand Neutron Star compaction schedule to given Neutron Star approximate density range!!
Smile Often And Have A Great Day!!

Harry Costas

Hello

Short hand hand or long Hand they are estimates.
And may even be composite density range.
It will take years from now to work out the rest.

Regardless they are quite dance.
The point is to understand the compaction from one transient to the other.
Neutron
Quark composite
Quark Keon matter
Quark
Partonic matter
Axion Matter
etc
The common property being,
Chiral Super-Symmetry Dipolar Electro-Magnetic Vector Fields.
How this property forms
Stars
Galaxies varies forms
Cyclic events

Hello

Short hand hand or long Hand they are estimates.
And may even be composite density range.
It will take years from now to work out the rest.

Regardless they are quite dance.
The point is to understand the compaction from one transient to the other.
Neutron
Quark composite
Quark Keon matter
Quark
Partonic matter
Axion Matter
etc
The common property being,
Chiral Super-Symmetry Dipolar Electro-Magnetic Vector Fields.
How this property forms
Stars
Galaxies varies forms
Cyclic events
Harry!! Quark permeable sacs cannot exist outside the proton permeable sac!! and Einsteins E=MC2 Is only a half-truth!! Because mass and energy are stored inside the neutron, the proton, the electron and the neutrino gaseous permeable indestructible minted sacs in the form of compressed GP1 Gaseous Aether Particles!!
The only way to permanently and physically store both mass and energy inside a permeable proton sac is in the form of pressurized God Particle 1s (GP1) Aether Particles!! Fictional absurd impossible transitional energy-mass "gluons" cannot keep destructible fragile up quarks from decompressing, disappearing and losing their GP1 Aether Particle mass outside of the indestructible proton permeable sac!!
And the down quark must be an orbiting combo of a destructible up quark and an indestructible electron permeable sac because when an electron indestructible permeable sac is spit out of the neutron envelope): IT IS INDESTRUCTIBLE and therefore, must have been indestructible inside the neutron envelope/permeable indestructible sac!?!?

Since there is much matter-antimatter interactions in our universe our supply of hydrogen derived from neutrons would end over infinite time!!
There are many ways that I can prove that embryonic neutrons are minted inside stars that warm up to neutrons from the CMBR and perpetuate our universe with freshly minted hydrogen forever and ever unto the ages of ages!!
The given miraculously pulling of identical proton indestructible sacs in pairs with antiproton permeable sacs from vacuum that immediately annihilate each other results in no additional proton mass!!

Whereas, my Neutron Evolution Theory and the minting of pristine new embryonic neutrons in the center of stars and the reverse beta decay of protons and electrons to neutrons also in the center of stars and under sufficient pulsating pressure to the neutronium of Neutron Stars and Black Holes): Simply Neutron Stars with an event horizon and over 3 solar masses of neutronium!! PERPETUATES OUR UNIVERSE FOREVER And EVER UNTO THE AGES OF AGES!!
THe bottom line is that "quark-gluon" composite matter cannot physically exist because there are no "gluons" and because up quark permeable sacs cannot exist outside of the nucleon permeable sac envelope!!
The Neutronium of Neutron Stars is the densest object actually observed and verified so far!!
Smile Often and Have A Great Day!!

Harry Costas

Quark matter can only be confined by a Neutron envelope.
Neutron matter can be confined by compaction of normal matter 10^5l

[Submitted on 15 Aug 2023]

Thermodynamics of quark matter with multiquark clusters in an effective Beth-Uhlenbeck type approach​

D. Blaschke, M. Cierniak, O. Ivanytskyi, G. Röpke
We describe multiquark clusters in quark matter within a Beth-Uhlenbeck approach in a background gluon field coupled to the underlying chiral quark dynamics using the Polyakov gauge which establishes the center symmetry of color SU(3) that suppresses colored states as an aspect of confinement. Quark confinement is modeled by a large quark mass in vacuum motivated by a confining density functional approach. A multiquark cluster containing n quarks and antiquarks is described as a binary composite of smaller subclusters n1 and n2 (n1+n2=n). It has a spectrum consisting of a bound state and a scattering state continuum. For the corresponding cluster-cluster phase shifts we discuss simple ansätze that capture the Mott dissociation of clusters as a function of temperature and chemical potential. We go beyond the simple "step-up-step-down" model that ignores continuum correlations and introduce an improved model that includes them in a generic form. In order to explain the model, we restrict ourselves here to the cases where the cluster size is 1≤n≤6. A striking result is the suppression of the abundance of colored multiquark clusters at low temperatures by the coupling to the Polyakov loop and their importance for a quantitative description of lattice QCD thermodynamics at non-vanishing baryochemical potentials. An important ingredient are Polyakov-loop generalized distribution functions of n-quark clusters which are derived here for the first time. Within our approach we calculate thermodynamic properties such as baryon density and entropy. We demonstrate that the limits of a hadron resonance gas at low temperatures and O(g2) perturbative QCD at high temperatures are correctly reproduced. A comparison with lattice calculations shows that our model is able to give a unified, systematic approach to describe properties of the quark-gluon-hadron system.

Quark matter can only be confined by a Neutron envelope.
Neutron matter can be confined by compaction of normal matter 10^5l

[Submitted on 15 Aug 2023]

Thermodynamics of quark matter with multiquark clusters in an effective Beth-Uhlenbeck type approach​

D. Blaschke, M. Cierniak, O. Ivanytskyi, G. Röpke
Harry, Thanks on agreeing on some of my points!! I appreciate!! But How can you stand "THIS DOUBLE TALK" that has absolutely nothing to do with reality!!

Paper): Thermodynamics of quark matter {Bounce Of Quarks Before Immediate Annihiliation And Release Of Energy!!} with multiquark clusters in an effective Beth-Uhlenbeck type approach??
Adoni asks): How do we know that the Beth-Uhlenbeck approach is an effective analogy type of the thermodynamics of quark matter {Bounce of Quark Matter And Not Energy release of energy from the disintegration of quarks}??
And can quarks/quark matter exist outside of the nucleon permeable sac?? No!! Thanks for agreeing Harry!!

Let's Google The Question): Can quarks exist outside of the nucleon envelope??
Wikipedia Says): Owing to a phenomenon known as color confinement, quarks are never found in isolation; they can be found only within hadrons, which include baryons (such as protons and neutrons) and mesons, or in quark–gluon plasmas!!

Now, let's google): Has a quark-gluon plasma ever been observed??
Answer): Yes): There is overwhelming evidence for production of quark–gluon plasma in relativistic heavy ion collisions!!

Even assuming the above to be true, we're talking about only microseconds before the alleged quark gluon plasma disappears into oblivion!!
In any event, any theorectical magical quark-gluon plasma produced by relativistic collisions of lead ions is tiny, fleeting and momentary and has absolutely no effect on the validity and proofs of my Nucleon Evolution Theory Or Fact from God Particle 1s (GP1s) about one quintillionth the mass of the neutrino that evolved to Neutrons and replicated themselves inside stars in a finite in volume ageless universe over infinite time??

Anyway): We are given both the immediate annihilation of the alleged quark-gluon matter in quark-antiquark interactions as follows by the paper writers themselves!!): Quote): "A multiquark cluster containing n quarks and antiquarks is described as a binary composite of smaller subclusters n1 and n2 (n1+n2=n)!!
Google Question): The fact is that not even one quintillionth of a gram of quark-gluon matter has been created at LHC-CERN??
Google Answer): "Yes, you’re correct. The amount of quark-gluon matter created in the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN is incredibly small. The LHC’s 2018 dataset included more than 13 billion lead-ion collisions, each of which released quarks and gluons that scattered and merged to form more than a quadrillion short-lived particles before cooling and decaying!!'
This absurd quark-gluon plasma theory is predicated on another misassumption theory that the Big Bang Energy Release “Creationist Singularity” magically made everything visible and invisible): Quote Given FALSEHOODS): “In the first millionths of a second after the Big Bang, the universe was a roiling, trillion-degree plasma of quarks and gluons — elementary particles that briefly glommed together in countless combinations before cooling and settling into more stable configurations to make the neutrons and protons of ordinary matter.
In the chaos before cooling, a fraction of these quarks and gluons collided randomly to form short-lived “X” particles, so named for their mysterious, unknown structures. Today, X particles are extremely rare, though physicists have theorized that they may be created in particle accelerators through quark coalescence, where high-energy collisions can generate similar flashes of quark-gluon plasma.
Now physicists at MIT’s Laboratory for Nuclear Science and elsewhere have found evidence of X particles in the quark-gluon plasma produced in the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN, the European Organization for Nuclear Research, based near Geneva, Switzerland!!"
So, are "long lived"condensates other than the neutronium of Neutron Stars possible??
Smile Often and Have A Great Day!!

Harry Costas

Hello Andoni

You cannot isolate Quark matter on Earth or anywhere else.
The matter would dominate the surroundings.
If you could, you would have a trillion-dollar business.

Like I keep saying.
We research and research in hope of further understanding.
I had this other science person for years argued that I was wrong.
Until the penny dropped.

I'm not trying to change your thinking.
You may be right in what you say.

But! my reseach for the last few decades have lead me to think along the line of Transient Condensates and their property.
Quantum Chromo Dynamic.
Chiral-Super-Symmetry-Dipolar-Electro-Magnetic- Vector fields
.
Imagine a compact body acting as one, like a huge Neutron.

Harry Costas

I do not know where the link is.
Re: The Big Bang Nucleosynthesis.
The stars as we know them expelled from an extreme compact body.

Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
658
Replies
7
Views
898
Replies
1
Views
429