http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/blackhole_milkyway_021016.html
.... have verified with near certainty the existence of a central black hole, a theoretical object that still eludes direct detection
With near certainty the existance - this does not state that a 100% level of accurate proof has been obtained to verify the result at 100% certainty. This drops the results by 30%.
...a theoretical object that still eludes direct detection.
theorectical - not proven to exist with visual confirmation but only on paper- this drops the certainty down by another 20%
...still eludes by direct detection
Still does not provide a 100% level a certainty through direct detection which would mean visual confirmation - this drops the results down even further by 30%.
So based on the results of inconsistent date and assumptions the results are really at only 20%. This is why it is important to understand the English venacular and what words mean.
Like Metoer Wanye stated we are 26,000 ly's away from the Milky Ways galactic center, the variances involved with building information of this sort off of how the results are determined based off of how the interactions with other objects relating to the actual find is the same as saying that you know what the person down the road twenty miles away from you is doing based off of what someone else is telling you that they are doing.
Unless we were within ten light years of the center of the galaxy then this information is just like playing the telephone game. One person starts by saying something and as the exchange of information goes around the circle depending on the number of people within the circle the information may change by one or two or even completely different then what the person starting the exchange said thus making the information unreliable even if the information exhanged was only off by one word.
.... have verified with near certainty the existence of a central black hole, a theoretical object that still eludes direct detection
With near certainty the existance - this does not state that a 100% level of accurate proof has been obtained to verify the result at 100% certainty. This drops the results by 30%.
...a theoretical object that still eludes direct detection.
theorectical - not proven to exist with visual confirmation but only on paper- this drops the certainty down by another 20%
...still eludes by direct detection
Still does not provide a 100% level a certainty through direct detection which would mean visual confirmation - this drops the results down even further by 30%.
So based on the results of inconsistent date and assumptions the results are really at only 20%. This is why it is important to understand the English venacular and what words mean.
Like Metoer Wanye stated we are 26,000 ly's away from the Milky Ways galactic center, the variances involved with building information of this sort off of how the results are determined based off of how the interactions with other objects relating to the actual find is the same as saying that you know what the person down the road twenty miles away from you is doing based off of what someone else is telling you that they are doing.
Unless we were within ten light years of the center of the galaxy then this information is just like playing the telephone game. One person starts by saying something and as the exchange of information goes around the circle depending on the number of people within the circle the information may change by one or two or even completely different then what the person starting the exchange said thus making the information unreliable even if the information exhanged was only off by one word.
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram