dark-matter energizes atoms

[mickeyl]

My discussion:<br />----Dark matter is the matter that powers/energizes atoms. It is everywhere,--and gives us the ability to live in a universe, that is composed of the past, present, and future. It allows us to have motion/movements with the continuous refreshing of atoms and photons in the universe, --much as a movie projector displays a movie, frame by frame. Space, does not exist, --what is thought of as space is actually an invisible substance, --very-low-mass dark matter. Because we're born into the visible universe, it's normal to think of space, as an actual entity, --without the ability to step outside our misconceptions, --and realize it is actually very low mass dark matter, --that is continually refreshing/energizing all the atoms of the universe.<br />And: <br />Gravity is the presence of dark matter, surrounding any mass/or massive object, --that is necessarily accumulating around an object (as it passes/or prepares to pass through) it, --to re-energize it's atoms. The more massive/energy laden, the body, the greater the gravitational pressure that is exerted by dark matter. The greater the mass of a celestial object, the deeper and stronger the gravitational waves necessary for dark matter to accumulate around, pass through and effectively, continuously, re-energize the atoms. So, this refreshing of atoms action, gives us the function of time-and-space movement. Dark matter is more than five times as abundant as all the matter detected in our visible universe. It's origin is outside of our universe, --which leads to the universe's expansion, --and dark-matter is partially, being injected through massive black-holes. The "speed-of-light", is the continuous speed of dark-matter injected into our universe, --on which light photons are being carried along. Of course, without dark-matter, the universe would cease to exist.<br />So, to repeat:<br />What we know as space, is in fact, very-low-mass, dark-matter. Dark-matter is more than five times as abundant as

 

[alokmohan]

Lets us go back to aether age.

 

[billslugg]

I want some of what he's smoking. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p> </p><p> </p> </div>

 

[Mee_n_Mac]

I'm tempted to say "gimme a P" ...<br /><br />Perhaps the OP could expound a bit more on his theory.<br /> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p>-----------------------------------------------------</p><p><font color="#ff0000">Ask not what your Forum Software can do do on you,</font></p><p><font color="#ff0000">Ask it to, please for the love of all that's Holy, <strong>STOP</strong> !</font></p> </div>

 

[MeteorWayne]

Unless that happens soon, may I add an "H" <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font color="#000080"><em><font color="#000000">But the Krell forgot one thing John. Monsters. Monsters from the Id.</font></em> </font></p><p><font color="#000080">I really, really, really, really miss the "first unread post" function</font><font color="#000080"> </font></p> </div>

 

[kyle_baron]

First of all, welcome to SDC! This is an interesting post.<br /><font color="yellow"><br />What we know as space, is in fact, very-low-mass, dark-matter.</font><br /><br />This is a possibility, since dark matter came 1st, followed by normal matter clumping around it.<br /><font color="yellow"><br />Dark-matter is more than five times as abundant as all the matter detected in our visible universe. </font><br /><br />True<br /><font color="yellow"><br /> Mass-atoms, within the universe, are being re-energized by this dark-matter that is being infused from outside our universe, moving at the "speed of light".</font><br /><br />Why is normal matter re-energized by dark matter?<br />How is normal matter re-energized by dark matter?<br /><br /> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font size="4"><strong></strong></font></p> </div>

 

[mickeyl]

Kyle, they are the atoms that compose you body, or any other massive object in our universe. They were in one variable state yesterday, another today, and yet another tomorrow, (being continually energized/refreshed, at the "speed of light"). <br />Mass is energy, --that is being refreshed by it's exposure to "so called dark-matter". It"s not dark, that is just the name given to it, because the scientific community could not envision it, --it being the most plentiful substance in our universe, (and has always been referred to as "empty space").<br />Why are atoms energized/re-energized, because they would disintegrate and revert back to pure energy, (mass would cease to exist), without it's interaction with (so-called) dark-matter.<br />How is matter energized? Because that is the way the universe was created originally. Think of positive and negative charges, (or a chemical reaction) as a somewhat similar reference. Atoms of mass are created by clumps of concentrated-energy, existing in a sea of infused "dark-matter". Thanks for the responses.

 

[mickeyl]

Also, Einstein had the answer; but just didn't realize that (C2) was the speed that <br /><br />light photons, were being carried along by a dispersion of dark-matter into <br /><br />our universe. So, (as: E = M x C2), or conversely (Mass = E/C2), --created <br /><br />mass is equal to; energy, divided by (or being acted upon by) C2 (C2 being <br /><br />the infusion of dark-matter), that carries light-photons throughout the <br /><br />universe.

 

[bobunf]

I'll add an "E"<br /><br />Bob

 

[kyle_baron]

<font color="yellow"><br />Why are atoms energized/re-energized, because they would disintegrate and revert back to pure energy, (mass would cease to exist), without it's interaction with (so-called) dark-matter. </font><br /><br />In other words, what you're saying is, dark matter exerts a gravitational force, which holds normal matter together? Without the dark matter, normal matter would come apart, in a burst of energy? I would say that's a possibility. But unfortunatly, there's no way to prove this hypothesis, is there?<br /><font color="yellow"><br />How is matter energized? Because that is the way the universe was created originally. Think of positive and negative charges, (or a chemical reaction) as a somewhat similar reference. Atoms of mass are created by clumps of concentrated-energy, existing in a sea of infused "dark-matter". </font><br /><br />I understand your reference to positive and negitive charges, but we can't think in terms of antimatter. The only other possibility would be an aether, correct?<br /> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font size="4"><strong></strong></font></p> </div>

 

[kyle_baron]

<font color="yellow"><br />I'll add an "E" </font><br /><br />Come on, give this guy a break. He obviously has a physics background. Are you all afraid of an original thought, or hypothesis? Are you a bunch of "scardy cats"? <img src="/images/icons/wink.gif" /><br /> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font size="4"><strong></strong></font></p> </div>

 

[MeteorWayne]

You think that's physics? <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font color="#000080"><em><font color="#000000">But the Krell forgot one thing John. Monsters. Monsters from the Id.</font></em> </font></p><p><font color="#000080">I really, really, really, really miss the "first unread post" function</font><font color="#000080"> </font></p> </div>

 

[kyle_baron]

<font color="yellow"><br /> Einstein had the answer; but just didn't realize that (C2) was the speed that light photons, were being carried along by a dispersion of dark-matter in our universe.</font><br /><br />To rephrase your statement, to make it clearer, by defining dispersion in terms of dark matter: <br /><br />Einstein had the answer, but didn't realize that (C2) was the speed that light photons were being carried along by the frequency (or wavelength) of dark matter (waves) in our universe. Is this correct? <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font size="4"><strong></strong></font></p> </div>