Deep Impact Hoax - 2

bigbrain · Jul 11, 2005

Incredible, incredible, incredible my dear fans go here: http://www.nasa.gov/mov/121520main_HRI-Movie.mov Nasa buffoons have taken away some frames and now you can no longer see the flash that before it developed like a mushroom cloud. Now the movie runs more fastly. Someone has informed the New Animations Softwares Agency. I do not make fun. It is really that way.

bigbrain · Jul 11, 2005

And now you have remained without words. I am right, all the movies are only 3D cartoons.

rubicondsrv · Jul 11, 2005

We have remained without words because we are hopeing you will get bored and go away. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>

votefornimitz · Jul 11, 2005

Steve, in case you have failed to notice, the atmosphere is made of the same thing /* ad hominem deleted */, air, and since there was no air in space, there can be no burning. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> In the event of a full scale nuclear war or NEO impact event, there are two categories of underground shelters available to the public, distinguished by depth underground: bunkers and graves... </div>

bigbrain · Jul 11, 2005

"Check this link : http://www.ballaerospace.com/di_target.html Note the star trackers onboard the spacecraft". And with all these very advanced telescopes (note the real images) you can see not even one star? VoteForNimitz is right: "Their excuse for being able to steer it, Using stars, but how can it use stars when it can't even see them... " Nasa says the probe runs at 36,000 kilometers per hour. It is false. It runs at 140,000 kilometers per hour (104,000 earth speed + 36,000 probe speed = 140,000 kilometers per hour).

bigbrain · Jul 11, 2005

Conspiracy of silence is rudest.

skyeagle409 · Jul 11, 2005

bigbrain---Nasa says the probe runs at 36,000 kilometers per hour. It is false. It runs at 140,000 kilometers per hour (104,000 earth speed + 36,000 probe speed = 140,000 kilometers per hour). bigbrain, What kind of stopwatch were you using when you clocked the velocity of that spacecraft? I know you didn't pull those figures from the internet because they were faked, remember?

skyeagle409 · Jul 11, 2005

"Why still in this mission have you not filmed your Impactor while going to meet the comet? It did". bigbrain---Let me see bigbrain, Sorry, but according to what you wrote, no looksy. To recap what you had said. ________________________________________________________________________________________ bigbrain asteroid 07/10/05 10:46 AM "I do not believe not even if I see it."

petepan · Jul 11, 2005

You can not do it with 3D cartoons Is this another stroke of genius?

ehrichweiss · Jul 11, 2005

Why are you going to space? To demonstrate your power, your strenght, that you are the most powerful country in the world. Why do you ask? Having problems with your "power"? Seems you're kinda jealous of the US or else you wouldn't have these types of issues. You sound like you're from France and having inferiority issues... Now tell me...do you want us to send a probe to take pictures of our probe that's doing research or would you prefer to just stop your silliness now? P.S. Everything is a "stone"..we're 3rd rock from the Sun, remember.

ehrichweiss · Jul 11, 2005

Is this another stroke of genius? It makes sense now...he's had a STROKE...forget the "of genius" part. No wonder he can't grasp simple concepts like...well.. everything.

arit · Jul 11, 2005

steve, You are not talking with a first grader, man. If things were so simple, I wouldn't be asking them. Look, here is the definition of a meteor: "a streak of light in the sky at night that results when a meteoroid hits the earth's atmosphere and air friction causes the meteoroid to melt or vaporize or explode " OK? In the meteor case, the air heats up as well as the meteor itself, from the friction. As the air heats up, it burns and emits light. In temple1's case, there is no air friction. We have things moving quickly, yes, but the conversion from kinetic energy to light is not straightforward. Maybe I'm not expressing my question correctly. No need to answer, I'll keep digging and will update you if I find something. Regards, arit <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> "We will either find a way, or make one!" - Hannibal </div>

skyeagle409 · Jul 11, 2005

bigbrain---Why are you going to space? bigbrain, Because it's there! bigbrain---You can not do it with 3D cartoons. sky---Since it was done for real, animations can be used for demonstrated purposes. bigbrain---When you have gone to Mars, sky---We have already done so. bigbrain---Why still in this mission have you not filmed your Impactor while going to meet the comet? sky---But, it was filmed so what's the point? For someone who can't get it right, you need to change to another school rather than attending the school that is operated by the 'Flat Earth Society.' Your lack of knowledge on the issues are well known.

skyeagle409 · Jul 11, 2005

bigbrain---Your answer is rude. I will inform moderators. sky---That's amusing coming from someone who is known for calling others by derogatory names.

yevaud · Jul 11, 2005

Big Brain = Non Compos Mentit <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> Differential Diagnosis: "I am both amused and annoyed that you think I should be less stubborn than you are." </div>

skyeagle409 · Jul 11, 2005

Yevaud, I wonder if bigbrain made it to high school yet. That could explain a lot.

skyeagle409 · Jul 11, 2005

Yevaud, Using bigbrain's logic, I am going to claim that since there is no air on the sun, it is nothing more than a figment of our imaginations. He didn't know about our star wars test where the interceptor and target went up in a bright flash of light when contact was made in space.

yevaud · Jul 12, 2005

Hell, using his logic, he'd insist that the sun doesn't exist - it's actually a gigantic illusion projected on the sky, using animation... <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> Differential Diagnosis: "I am both amused and annoyed that you think I should be less stubborn than you are." </div>

skyeagle409 · Jul 12, 2005

Yevaud, LOL!! The next time I see images of super novas and stars, I will just write them off as mere illusions and thank bigbrain for bringing me around to his form of reality that stars cannot shine and that super novas cannot exist because there is no air in space.

skyeagle409 · Jul 12, 2005

bigbrain---But you can not steer two smallest probes to a target 133 million kilometers distant because you have not technology to see them, to locate them in the 3D space, in the darkness of universe bigbrain, If that is true, then there is no such thing as water. As I have been correctly saying, you have no idea what you are talking about.

bigbrain · Jul 12, 2005

"bigbrain, If that is true, then there is no such thing as water". Do you want to see a thing simple as water? First see this: http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/deepimpact/multimedia/0701-ge.html (Right click on "View related animation" Left click on "Save object by name") Then go here: http://deepimpact.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/bye_bye_DI.html Read carefully: "This image of the Deep Impact spacecraft was obtained with Caltech's 200-inch Hale telescope on top of Palomar Mountain at 4:00 AM PST (12:00 UT) Thursday January 13, 2005, about 15 hours after the spacecraft's successul launch. Deep Impact was about 260,000 km (163,000 mi) away from the Earth, moving at a speed of about 16,000 km/hour (10,000 mi/hr). This high speed causes the spacecraft to appear as a streak across the sky in the constellation Virgo during the 10-minute exposure time of the image. The spacraft is visible because it is reflecting light from the sun as it begins its journey towards comet Tempel 1. This image was obtained by Dr. Michael D. Hicks and Dr. Bonnie J. Buratti, both at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory". Have you read well? They say: "Deep Impact was about 260,000 km (163,000 mi) away from the Earth, moving at a speed of about 16,000 km/hour" Not at all, it is completely false. 104,000 kph (earth speed) + 16,000 kph (probe speed) = 120,000 kph. The probe speed would be of 120,000 kilometers per hour. In this site: http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/deepimpact/media/deepimpact-070805.html They say: "Expectations for Deep Impact's flyby spacecraft were exceeded during its close brush with

petepan · Jul 12, 2005

Ah, I see, so, going by your logic, the space craft does exist, but you're unhappy with the speeds? So the probe is real then, eh?

bigbrain · Jul 12, 2005

If Nasa buffoons can not even calculate the speed of their virtual probes designed with Maya and 3D Studio Max or with PTC Wildfire and Solid Edge because they have not considered the earth speed, what would you think about their ability to send real probes in the darkness of universe?

telfrow · Jul 12, 2005

<img src="/images/icons/rolleyes.gif" /> <img src="/images/icons/crazy.gif" /> Impeccable logic. <img src="/images/icons/crazy.gif" /> <img src="/images/icons/rolleyes.gif" /> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will to strive, to seek, to find and not to yeild. - Tennyson </div>

telfrow · Jul 12, 2005

BB: Let's extend your "logic"... We know you believe Americans didn't go to the moon, haven't sent missions to Mars or to Tempel 1. It's all a hoax. A conspiracy. So how do you explain what's found on this page? Are all these missions and all these nations participating in the hoax? http://www.solarviews.com/eng/craft1.htm <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will to strive, to seek, to find and not to yeild. - Tennyson </div>

Deep Impact Hoax - 2

bigbrain

Guest

bigbrain

Guest

rubicondsrv

Guest

votefornimitz

Guest

bigbrain

Guest

bigbrain

Guest

skyeagle409

Guest

skyeagle409

Guest

petepan

Guest

ehrichweiss

Guest

ehrichweiss

Guest

arit

Guest

skyeagle409

Guest

skyeagle409

Guest

yevaud

Guest

skyeagle409

Guest

skyeagle409

Guest

yevaud

Guest

skyeagle409

Guest

skyeagle409

Guest

bigbrain

Guest

petepan

Guest

bigbrain

Guest

telfrow

Guest

telfrow

Guest

Similar threads

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts

Share this page