Deep Impact Predictions

[CalliArcale]

This thread is getting a bit on the long side and will have to be locked. (I wasn't paying attention and didn't see it go over the 600 post limit.) Before I lock it, is there any interest in me starting up a "part two" thread for it? <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p> </p><p><font color="#666699"><em>"People assume that time is a strict progression of cause to effect, but actually from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint it's more like a big ball of wibbly wobbly . . . timey wimey . . . stuff."</em>  -- The Tenth Doctor, "Blink"</font></p> </div>

 

[robnissen]

My vote is to just lock it. This poor horse has been beaten long after it died. If anyone wants to beat it further, they can always start a new thread. (I wish I had one of those beating a dead horse emoticons. <img src="/images/icons/frown.gif" /> )

 

[yevaud]

Here ya go...<br /><br /> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><em>Differential Diagnosis:  </em>"<strong><em>I am both amused and annoyed that you think I should be less stubborn than you are</em></strong>."<br /> </p> </div>

 

[smartie]

Post deleted by smartie

 

[yevaud]

Nice.<br /><br />Too bad that "Thunderbolts" is neither science, nor a credible scientific reference. Nor has the "Electric Universe" remotely proven itself.<br /><br />Try again. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><em>Differential Diagnosis:  </em>"<strong><em>I am both amused and annoyed that you think I should be less stubborn than you are</em></strong>."<br /> </p> </div>