M
michaelmozina
Guest
EU theories related to comets seems to offer us a logical method to explain recent observations. For some background information on Electric Comet theory, you might want to read this paper:<br /><br />http://www.thunderbolts.info/pdf/ElectricComet.pdf<br /><br />Two recent observations lend strong support to Thornhill and Talbot's theories:<br /><br />http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/071001_comet_surprises.html<br /><br /><blockquote><font class="small">In reply to:</font><hr /><p>The study, detailed in the Oct. 1 issue of Astrophysical Journal, also found <b>the comet tail acted as a source of electrons for the solar wind </b>.<br /><br />The solar wind consists of charged atoms that are missing most of their electrons, but <b>Ulysses found that solar wind particles passing through the comet's atmosphere could regain some of those electrons.</b> The particles exhibit a different charge when they do this, which SWICS can detect.<p><hr /></p></p></blockquote><br /><br />One way for the comet's tail to act as a source of electrons for solar wind particles would be for the comet to act as a conductor of current, between the relatively positively charged surface of the sun, and the relatively negatively charged solar sheath. <br /><br />http://www.space.com/spacewatch/071025-comet-holmes.html<br /><br /><blockquote><font class="small">In reply to:</font><hr /><p>Comet Holmes, which was discovered in November 1892 by Edwin Holmes, in London England, was no brighter than magnitude 17 in mid-October—that's about 25,000 times fainter than the faintest star that can normally be seen without any optical aid. In order to view an object this faint, one would need a moderately large telescope.<br /><br />But the comet's brightness has suddenly roc</p></blockquote> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> It seems to be a natural consequence of our points of view to assume that the whole of space is filled with electrons and flying electric ions of all kinds. - Kristian Birkeland </div>