Question Infinity or not infinity that is the question.

[Catastrophe]

Harry, just to amplify a little.

Loving a marriage partner, is not the same as
Loving a parent or sibling, is not the same as
Loving a good friend, is not the same as
Loving a piece of music, is not the same as
Loving spaghetti bolognaise, is not the same as
Loving to watch a favourite TV program.

Having confidence in skiing, is not the same as (ability)
Having confidence in someone to keep an appointment, is not the same as (trust)
Having confidence in a newspaper, is not the same as (fairness)

Being a good friend, is not the same as (trust)
Having a good time, is not the same as (enjoyment)
Drinking a good wine, is not the same as (taste)
Making good time, is not the same as (punctuality)
Being good, is not the same as (behaviour)
Making good, (success)

There are many more examples, even if some of these refer only to shades of meaning.

Cat

 

[Atlan0001]

Fundamental binary base(....) '0' and/or '1' are not, is not, the same as (+/-) decimal '0' and/or '1'.

 

[Classical Motion]

For me, the confusion and discussion is not about context or definitions. It’s about the measurements.

You may believe that expanding space, taking galaxies with it, is causing those insane rates.

But it shows me that something is wrong. And it has to be the dogma of light, for that’s the only thing they will not consider.

Science has restricted itself with this dogma. And for the spacetime pure-est, this dogma is now impossible to either prove or disprove. And insist that velocity sets time and length.

I believe this intellect is of poor quality. It is more like a religion, then a science. With false relics.

Physics has become a philosophy now, instead of a science. A path for faith thought, instead of a path of discovery.

Just an observation. And the context gleaned from it. I believe redshift will be the greatest misunderstanding in science history.

And once that is cleared up, a new context for this cosmos will begin. A totally new cosmology.

Quantum light.

 

[Catastrophe]

For me, the confusion and discussion is not about context or definitions. It’s about the measurements.

You may believe that expanding space, taking galaxies with it, is causing those insane rates.

But it shows me that something is wrong. And it has to be the dogma of light, for that’s the only thing they will not consider.

Science has restricted itself with this dogma. And for the spacetime pure-est, this dogma is now impossible to either prove or disprove. And insist that velocity sets time and length.

I believe this intellect is of poor quality. It is more like a religion, then a science. With false relics.

Physics has become a philosophy now, instead of a science. A path for faith thought, instead of a path of discovery.

Just an observation. And the context gleaned from it. I believe redshift will be the greatest misunderstanding in science history.

And once that is cleared up, a new context for this cosmos will begin. A totally new cosmology.

Quantum light.

Of course the measurements are the bread and butter, but you then need deductions and hypotheses. These require words, with accurately defined meanings, which are the province of science.

May I point out politely, that, in some cases, you seem to have read the opposite of what I posted.

Cat

 

[Harry Costas]

Cat
You are a thinker
Good on you
Be Happy