I'm addressing your personal attacks, which have nothing to do with the above, and you know it! The last line of the above is the way to go about it.You haven't give a counter argument, you have quoted a few bits and made an assumption without explanation . I gave the counter argument with evidence proving Olbers paradox isn't a real thing .
Are you saying space isn't transparent or there isn't EMR between distance bodies ?
The present information says darkness is the absence of light , this isn't even your own thought , it is an implant of education that is incorrect !To me darkness is the absence of light.
But there might be a lot of sideways light that we can't see. So even if filled with light, it would still be dark.
What personal attacks ? Calling something gibberish isn't offensive .What do you want me say , oh that is great when it wasn't ?I'm addressing your personal attacks, which have nothing to do with the above, and you know it! The last line of the above is the way to go about it.
So you continue to send the drone up into space and into the distance , as the space changed from being transparent? Of course not !I'm addressing your personal attacks, which have nothing to do with the above, and you know it! The last line of the above is the way to go about it.
Of course, he isn't. Yes, Atlan is hard to understand sometimes but give him some room and pick the gems. That sounds very patronising (apologies Atlan but you don't deserve disrespect). I know you are more than capable of sorting Thermo but he is challenging and we need that. Even if so far fairly trivial but that's because he isn't quite 'in the swing of things here'. Ha ha, he thinks we are all daft. He'll learn.You haven't give a counter argument, you have quoted a few bits and made an assumption without explanation . I gave the counter argument with evidence proving Olbers paradox isn't a real thing .
Are you saying space isn't transparent or there isn't EMR between distance bodies ?
I am going easy on ''them'',you really wouldn't want me to come down hard on science . I can dispute ''their'' math and other stuff very easily !capable of sorting Thermo but he is challenging and we need that.
I'd call it Absolute Space like Newton taught me !What term would you call an empty transparency?
Not everywhere because there is regions of Space beyond our observations that are still Absolute Space ! Space is infinite , it can never completely fill with light and this is a good thing because visual Universes would overheat all the time without this .There are EMR everywhere.
It does "overheat all the time" (in superposition). It's called the "Planck heat."Not everywhere because there is regions of Space beyond our observations that are still Absolute Space ! Space is infinite , it can never completely fill with light and this is a good thing because visual Universes would overheat all the time without this .
James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) has revealed a population of red and compact sources at z≳5 known as "Little Red Dots" (LRDs) that are likely active galactic nuclei (AGNs). Here we present a comprehensive study of the variability of 314 LRDs with multi-epoch JWST observations in five deep fields: UDS, GOODS-S, GOODS-N, Abell 2744, and COSMOS. Our analyses use all publicly available JWST NIRCam imaging data in these fields, together with multi-epoch JWST MIRI images available. We measure the significance of the variabilities (signal-to-noise ratio or SNRvar) for all LRDs and statistically evaluate their variabilities using the SNRvar distributions. We pay particular attention to the systematic offsets of photometric zero points among different epochs that seem to commonly exist. The derived SNRvar distributions of the LRDs, including those with broad Hα/Hβ emission lines, follow the standard Gaussian distribution, and are generally consistent with those of the comparison samples of objects detected in the same images. This finding suggests that the LRD population on average does not show strong variability, which can be due to super-Eddington accretion of the black holes in AGNs. Alternatively, they are dominated by galaxies. We also find eight strongly variable LRD candidates with variability amplitudes of 0.24 - 0.82 mag. The rest-frame optical SEDs of these variable LRDs should have significant AGN contribution. Future JWST observations will provide more variability information of LRDs.
Call it what you like but that isn't true , Space can never overheat by design . I'm not about to lecture you on heat or how things work . I will give some simple answers just to be polite but I am going to avoid some major stuff .It does "overheat all the time" (in superposition). It's called the "Planck heat."
Note I said '' visual Universes would overheat all the time without this .'' Only matter can be affected by heat because of the propagation of light .It does "overheat all the time" (in superposition). It's called the "Planck heat."
Aww! Lecture all you want! I've lectured many times in many posts, including regarding temperature and the Trojan of "temperate"!Call it what you like but that isn't true , Space can never overheat by design . I'm not about to lecture you on heat or how things work . I will give some simple answers just to be polite but I am going to avoid some major stuff .
What on Earth has that suppose to be ?Aww! Lecture all you want! I've lectured many times in many posts, including regarding temperature and the Trojan of "temperate"!
Definition of TEMPERATE
having a moderate climate which especially lacks extremes in temperature; found in or associated with a moderate climate; marked by moderation: such as… See the full definitionwww.merriam-webster.com
To be continued....
Your writing gibberish again , are you using a random theory generator ?Aww heck! Continued!
Hawking's extreme constant of an entropically temperate (moderate) "Life Zone" of universes to go with the higher energy extreme of hot as hell (the Planck heat). The cold (coarse grain chunky plane) is actually within the entropic temperate zone where we live.
One of us is dealing in angry arrogantly ignorant 1-dimensional absolutist "gibberish" regarding the must metaphysical of "Cosmology" and it isn't me!Your writing gibberish again , are you using a random theory generator ?
If you are trying to get me to translate your post , think again , I have cold read mode activated !
There was zero anger in my post . Do you have anything to debate or not?One of us is dealing in angry arrogantly ignorant 1-dimensional absolutist "gibberish" regarding the must metaphysical of "Cosmology" and it isn't me!
You haven't falsified a thing, and won't falsify a thing, except in your own mind. We've got a great bunch of thinkers and visionaries here and you are trying so hard to not be one of either.There was zero anger in my post . Do you have anything to debate or not?
Can you falsify my work ?
I can falsify yours easily!
There is no educating a brick wall , I have shown you all many things but you must be poor thinkers if you don't get it !You haven't falsified a thing, and won't falsify a thing, except in your own mind. We've got a great bunch of thinkers and visionaries here and you are trying so hard to not be one of either.
You are wrong if you think we would not want you to come down 'hard'. That is good so long as it is done with respect. Please do so.I am going easy on ''them'',you really wouldn't want me to come down hard on science . I can dispute ''their'' math and other stuff very easily !