Question Infinity or not infinity that is the question.

[Classical Motion]

To me darkness is the absence of light.

But there might be a lot of sideways light that we can't see. So even if filled with light, it would still be dark.

 

[Atlan0001]

You haven't give a counter argument, you have quoted a few bits and made an assumption without explanation . I gave the counter argument with evidence proving Olbers paradox isn't a real thing .

Are you saying space isn't transparent or there isn't EMR between distance bodies ?

I'm addressing your personal attacks, which have nothing to do with the above, and you know it! The last line of the above is the way to go about it.

 

[Thermoman]

To me darkness is the absence of light.

But there might be a lot of sideways light that we can't see. So even if filled with light, it would still be dark.

The present information says darkness is the absence of light , this isn't even your own thought , it is an implant of education that is incorrect !

Darkness is a observation perception of something that isn't illuminated that blends in with the observation perception that space is dark . The only reason space looks dark though is because there is nothing illuminated in that space .

Ok, try this , here is a lesson on sight .

Even with your eyes shut , you mind is connected to Space-Time and when you open your eyes , you can see through space-time anything that is illuminated or not illuminated .

Fly a visually black drone in the sky at night and look up . You can't see the drone but you know very well the space between your eyes and the drone isn't opaque , it is transparent .

 

[Thermoman]

I'm addressing your personal attacks, which have nothing to do with the above, and you know it! The last line of the above is the way to go about it.

What personal attacks ? Calling something gibberish isn't offensive .What do you want me say , oh that is great when it wasn't ?

 

[Thermoman]

I'm addressing your personal attacks, which have nothing to do with the above, and you know it! The last line of the above is the way to go about it.

So you continue to send the drone up into space and into the distance , as the space changed from being transparent? Of course not !

 

[Classical Motion]

What term would you call an empty transparency? I simply call it dark, a description, not a color. A description of the transparency. Light has color. And brightness.

The best transparency would be the darkest.

 

[Gibsense]

You haven't give a counter argument, you have quoted a few bits and made an assumption without explanation . I gave the counter argument with evidence proving Olbers paradox isn't a real thing .

Are you saying space isn't transparent or there isn't EMR between distance bodies ?

Of course, he isn't. Yes, Atlan is hard to understand sometimes but give him some room and pick the gems. That sounds very patronising (apologies Atlan but you don't deserve disrespect). I know you are more than capable of sorting Thermo but he is challenging and we need that. Even if so far fairly trivial but that's because he isn't quite 'in the swing of things here'. Ha ha, he thinks we are all daft. He'll learn.

 

[Thermoman]

capable of sorting Thermo but he is challenging and we need that.

I am going easy on ''them'',you really wouldn't want me to come down hard on science . I can dispute ''their'' math and other stuff very easily !

 

[Thermoman]

What term would you call an empty transparency?

I'd call it Absolute Space like Newton taught me !

People don't realise that when Einstein converged Space and Time to create Space-Time, the underlying Space in his theory , was Newtons Absolute Space .
I listened to Newton , Einstein and Higgs to conclude that Absolute Space has a conservation property and any given point (x0,y0,z0,) conserves a 1:1 ratio of light . This conservation being the ''fabric'' of Space-Time or a Higgs ''field''. In the old days this conservation was known as the aether but until now , ''undetected''.

I discovered it was light by thinking about it ! A single Photon in an absolute space becomes stationary because any given point of the Space is identical to the point it presently occupies .
What this means is that the point it occupies has the same force (Gravity-B) as any other point so the Photon would have inertia because of this fact .

More technically , any given point of an Absolute Space has an Eigen value of 0 . The conserved Photon point has an Eigen value of 1 . The Photon then cannot transition from one position to another because it is conserved by its stationary conservation position .

It gets quite complex but that is my answer to your question !

 

[Harry Costas]

There are EMR everywhere.
If you can see stars, EMR is transmitted.

 

[Thermoman]

There are EMR everywhere.

Not everywhere because there is regions of Space beyond our observations that are still Absolute Space ! Space is infinite , it can never completely fill with light and this is a good thing because visual Universes would overheat all the time without this .

 

[Atlan0001]

Not everywhere because there is regions of Space beyond our observations that are still Absolute Space ! Space is infinite , it can never completely fill with light and this is a good thing because visual Universes would overheat all the time without this .

It does "overheat all the time" (in superposition). It's called the "Planck heat."

In two-plane fractal zooms structure of universes, it's known as the (go with) smooth plane . . . as opposed to the (go against) coarse-grained chunky plane.

 

[Harry Costas]

We keep learning, and then some.

[Submitted on 5 Nov 2024]

Analysis of Multi-epoch JWST Images of ∼300 Little Red Dots: Tentative Detection of Variability in a Minority of Sources​

Zijian Zhang, Linhua Jiang, Weiyang Liu, Luis C. Ho

James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) has revealed a population of red and compact sources at z≳5 known as "Little Red Dots" (LRDs) that are likely active galactic nuclei (AGNs). Here we present a comprehensive study of the variability of 314 LRDs with multi-epoch JWST observations in five deep fields: UDS, GOODS-S, GOODS-N, Abell 2744, and COSMOS. Our analyses use all publicly available JWST NIRCam imaging data in these fields, together with multi-epoch JWST MIRI images available. We measure the significance of the variabilities (signal-to-noise ratio or SNRvar) for all LRDs and statistically evaluate their variabilities using the SNRvar distributions. We pay particular attention to the systematic offsets of photometric zero points among different epochs that seem to commonly exist. The derived SNRvar distributions of the LRDs, including those with broad Hα/Hβ emission lines, follow the standard Gaussian distribution, and are generally consistent with those of the comparison samples of objects detected in the same images. This finding suggests that the LRD population on average does not show strong variability, which can be due to super-Eddington accretion of the black holes in AGNs. Alternatively, they are dominated by galaxies. We also find eight strongly variable LRD candidates with variability amplitudes of 0.24 - 0.82 mag. The rest-frame optical SEDs of these variable LRDs should have significant AGN contribution. Future JWST observations will provide more variability information of LRDs.

 

[Thermoman]

It does "overheat all the time" (in superposition). It's called the "Planck heat."

Call it what you like but that isn't true , Space can never overheat by design . I'm not about to lecture you on heat or how things work . I will give some simple answers just to be polite but I am going to avoid some major stuff .

 

[Thermoman]

It does "overheat all the time" (in superposition). It's called the "Planck heat."

Note I said '' visual Universes would overheat all the time without this .'' Only matter can be affected by heat because of the propagation of light .

 

[Atlan0001]

Call it what you like but that isn't true , Space can never overheat by design . I'm not about to lecture you on heat or how things work . I will give some simple answers just to be polite but I am going to avoid some major stuff .

Aww! Lecture all you want! I've lectured many times in many posts, including regarding temperature and the Trojan of "temperate"!

Definition of TEMPERATE

having a moderate climate which especially lacks extremes in temperature; found in or associated with a moderate climate; marked by moderation: such as… See the full definition

www.merriam-webster.com

To be continued....

 

[Thermoman]

Aww! Lecture all you want! I've lectured many times in many posts, including regarding temperature and the Trojan of "temperate"!

Definition of TEMPERATE

having a moderate climate which especially lacks extremes in temperature; found in or associated with a moderate climate; marked by moderation: such as… See the full definition

www.merriam-webster.com

To be continued....

What on Earth has that suppose to be ?

Temperature is a measure !

Heat is a perception via the senses !

Overheat is a generalised statement that can refer to several things in slang terms.

''A Cars Engine overheats'' where the correct term would be the Car Engines temperature caused the Engine to fail !

Are you a bot ? Engines don't feel heat but can experience overheating !

 

[Atlan0001]

Aww heck! Continued! (You would make a great straight man in a comedy team!)

Hawking's extreme constant of an entropically temperate (moderate) "Life Zone" of universes to go with the higher energy extreme of hot as hell (the smooth of the Planck heat). The cold (coarse grain chunky plane) is actually within the entropic temperate zone where we live.

 

[Thermoman]

Aww heck! Continued!

Hawking's extreme constant of an entropically temperate (moderate) "Life Zone" of universes to go with the higher energy extreme of hot as hell (the Planck heat). The cold (coarse grain chunky plane) is actually within the entropic temperate zone where we live.

Your writing gibberish again , are you using a random theory generator ?

If you are trying to get me to translate your post , think again , I have cold read mode activated !

 

[Atlan0001]

Your writing gibberish again , are you using a random theory generator ?

If you are trying to get me to translate your post , think again , I have cold read mode activated !

One of us is dealing in angry arrogantly ignorant 1-dimensional absolutist "gibberish" regarding the must metaphysical of "Cosmology" and it isn't me!

 

[Thermoman]

One of us is dealing in angry arrogantly ignorant 1-dimensional absolutist "gibberish" regarding the must metaphysical of "Cosmology" and it isn't me!

There was zero anger in my post . Do you have anything to debate or not?

Can you falsify my work ?

I can falsify yours easily!