W
witmoreland
Guest
Geeze, I'm so disappointed. I had really high hopes for them. <br /><br />At this point, they should just change their name to "The Stargate Channel". I'm OD'ed on Stargate. And they're making a classic mistake they should recognize from Star Trek: They're taking Stargate, which is a wide-open story-board, and confining it to "Star Gate Atlantis", which is akin to DS9. I have news for them - there's no way they can take a wide-open storyboard that travels the galaxies, confine it to an unmoving box which is restricted to looking at whatever creative thing they can think of to wander by, and call it an "improvement". <br /><br />And that's only a single mention of the "sci-fi" that's actually ON the sci-fi channel. For good reason. There's not much sci-fi left on the sci-fi channel anymore. <br /><br />You have your grandfathered concessions like Outer Limits (which I LOVE) and STOS (which I love), but that's about it for the true sci-fi fans. <br /><br />Most of their stuff isn't even Sci-Fi. It's B-horror - much more entertaining when viewed from the "Mystery Science Theatre" perspective. Whatever happened to that show? <br /><br />Aside from that you have crap like Roswell 90210. That's mild crap, but crap nonetheless. Then there's the hardcore crap like "mad mad house", which was both disgusting and non-sci-fi. And Tripping The Rift (which nobody with 2 brain cells to rub together would watch) . It wouldn't have been so bad if they'd have advertised it within the target audience (like Bravo and MTV), but the promo spots for them (on G-rated shows like Incredible Hulk!!!!!) with the bits about "covering in animal parts", "scavaging for food nekkid" and "drinking, farting and screwing" (repeated twice for emphasis) etc were just way too over the top. Those were so unnaceptable we had to (relunctantly) lock the entire channel out of the remote. We have kids here. Not that we wanted to see that crap, either. Shows are one thing. We can monitor and choose on those. But if we c