Letter To President Bush, NASA, Embassies Wash-DC

[censorship_space_dot_com]

Mr. George W. Bush <br />President of the United States of America <br />The White House <br />1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. <br />Washington, D.C. 20500 <br />Fax: (202)456-2883 <br />Attn: Mr. Richard B Cheney - Vice President of the United States <br />Attn: Mr. Stephen J. Hadley - National Security Advisor to the President <br />Attn: Mr. John Marburger - Executive Office - Science & Technology <br />Attn: Mr. Frederick D. Gregory - Administrator - N.A.S.A. <br /><br />Subject: Link To Official Letter From The ISA Washington, DC Offices: <br />--------------------------------------------------------------------- <br />http://www.international-space-agency.net/wash_dc_letter_feb_2005.html <br /><br />International Space Agency ( I. S. A. ) <br />----------------------------------------- <br />http://www.international-space-agency.org <br /><br /><br />Dear Mr. President Bush, Sir, <br /><br />Please see the link above of the Official Letter to You, Your Staff, <br />and the United States Government, and Specifically,(N.A.S.A.) National <br />Aeronautics And Space Administration. <br /><br />I will be "Personally Hand Delivering" a Diplomatic Letter and Formal <br />Request to You, at the White House, sometime in the week of the <br />28th of February 2005. This letter will be a notarized hard copy of <br />the letter on the link above. I look forward to speaking with You if <br />at all possible, or meeting with a member of Your Staff at the <br />White House in Washington, D.C. <br /><br />I will be visiting "ALL" the Embassies and National Space Agency Offices <br />here in Washington, D.C. over the next Week or two. <br /><br />Please see, below, our outline for Formal Diplomatic Activities and <br />Agendas for the International Space Agency Washington, D.C. Offices, as <br />well as information about the International S

 

[shuttle_rtf]

Hmmm. I'll have to have a look at all of this - and their site.<br /><br />Anyone know who these guys are?<br /><br />Something tells me there's some money behind them - but then you go to the site and it's in need of bringing out of the 1990s - as well as some paragraphs and grammar. But I need to look at this more.

 

[grooble]

Seem to be enthusiasts trying to do something positive, but they get bashed a lot.

 

[drwayne]

I believe some people claiming to be from this organization were making all sorts of claims about taking legal action against some members here some months ago.<br /><br />Wayne <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p>"1) Give no quarter; 2) Take no prisoners; 3) Sink everything."  Admiral Jackie Fisher</p> </div>

 

[drwayne]

Its been a while now, the exchanges might have been pre-crash.<br /><br />Wayne <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p>"1) Give no quarter; 2) Take no prisoners; 3) Sink everything."  Admiral Jackie Fisher</p> </div>

 

[zavvy]

<font color="yellow">I believe some people claiming to be from this organization were making all sorts of claims about taking legal action against some members here some months ago.</font><br /><br />Were their claims valid?

 

[drwayne]

In the end they appeared to be just threats.<br /><br />Wayne <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p>"1) Give no quarter; 2) Take no prisoners; 3) Sink everything."  Admiral Jackie Fisher</p> </div>

 

[zavvy]

<font color="yellow">In the end they appeared to be just threats. </font><br /><br />But were they valid?

 

[drwayne]

In todays litigious society, who can tell?<br /><br />At the time, I first took the threats quite seriously, but later it looked more like the "You disagreed with me in public, I am going to sue you unless SDC sensors you" stuff that goes on from time to time.<br /><br />Wayne <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p>"1) Give no quarter; 2) Take no prisoners; 3) Sink everything."  Admiral Jackie Fisher</p> </div>

 

[zavvy]

<font color="yellow">In todays litigious society, who can tell?</font><br /><br />Well, libel is certainly a valid complaint. But if they were upset because you were merely disagreeing with their position then I wouldn't even worry about it..unless serious threats were made against them..<br /><br />

 

[drwayne]

Some quick searches did not pull up the stuff, so it was either pre-crash, or got wiped...<br /><br />Wayne <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p>"1) Give no quarter; 2) Take no prisoners; 3) Sink everything."  Admiral Jackie Fisher</p> </div>

 

[grooble]

Nah it was that argument between Mental Avenger and some ISA guy, the guy went nuts. The threads are wiped. They are always getting their posts deleted. Thats why he chose the name, Censorship.<br /><br />

 

[mental_avenger]

It wasn't really an argument. When Rick posted his solicitation spam on 5 different message boards, I pointed out that one was enough and he should delete the others. I also noted that he had done this same spam posting on other space forums. He posted an adendum to the first spam on each of the message boards. When I pointed out that was a violation of the TOS he went ballistic and threatened lawsuits against me and Space.com. Of course there was no basis for such action, but that didn't stop him from posting a whole string of threats and false accusations. Personally, I thought it was quite humerous. Clearly, SDC thought it was frivolous.<br /><br />Bottom line, Rick has been attempting to create an organization that will control all of the space related activity on Earth since about 1987. That "organization" consists of a few guys with big wishes and little else. Everywhere they post they antagonize the members. They need a serious reality check. The term meglomania comes to mind. <img src="/images/icons/smile.gif" /> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p style="margin-top:0in;margin-left:0in;margin-right:0in" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman" size="2" color="#ff0000"><strong>Our Solar System must be passing through a Non Sequitur area of space.</strong></font></p> </div>