<font color="yellow">What do you mean?</font><br /><br />Just what you said. <img src="/images/icons/laugh.gif" /> I was referring to exactly what you just stated, yeah, do it just like that, we're on the same page.<br /><br />I don't see a lot of stuff needing to be kept in the private area, but we'll need to have that option from time to time. Pretty much anything along the lines of "let's use this technology", while in the early stages of discussion, should be public, warts and all, so lurkers can follow our progress.<br /><br />It's going to be important to be as open as possible, but we don't want to be sloppy and let ourselves look like idiots either.<br /><br />Things like negotiations with Affiliates and certain other sensitive current business doesn't need to be made available to the whole world. That kind of stuff needs to be monitored by enough individuals to prevent power tripping. The part of Python's Grail's scene 3 I was thinking about was the rotation of the executive office among a group of peers. I.e. the guy in charge this week can make certain executive decisions needed to achieve growth, finalize a deal with a key affiliate, etc.<br /><br />So we want to be very open, as said in the past, but OTOH, we might want to put some of our content in a glass case so a new sponsor (Joe 39 Million) would get a password to more details or prettier pictures or something. Both approaches have merit, I suppose we balance them and try to get the best of both methods.<br /><br />I guess we could develop a series of tiers of access to ACCESS, the more you contribute, the more access you get. I've toyed with that idea and am still on the fence. It's a gimmick. Maybe a good gimmick, but it would be nice to be relatively gimmick free if we can. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>