<blockquote><font class="small">In reply to:</font><hr /><p>I didn't know that they had a booster for that. Also, I didn't think they have ever done this manned or unmanned. And 100 M seems rather cheap.<p><hr /></p></p></blockquote><br /><br />Believe it or not, they do have a booster for it, and they have done it unmanned! It's not something very many people know about, and it's part of the convoluted story of the Russian race to the Moon. <br /><br />But yes, $100 mil does seem a bit cheap, but then, that's just for one seat. I'm guessing it's mainly to defray expenses, and now that the US is talking of going to the Moon, they want to try for bragging rights again. Also, now that Korolev is out of the picture, having been dead for decades, there will be less political opposition to Chelomei's booster. That's a long story, but I'll give an abbreviated version here. <img src="/images/icons/wink.gif" /><br /><br />Years ago, the Russians decided they wanted to go to the Moon. Like the Americans, they knew that landing on the Moon was great for bragging rights, and that it demonstrated enormous technological prowess. Furthermore, the Moon is the ultimate in high ground, without leaving the Earth system. It's kind of useless today, but someday it could be very useful indeed.<br /><br />Two different camps developed with their own plans for a Moon mission. Korolev (often regarded as the Soviet Werner Von Braun) conceived of a mammoth booster called the N-1. This would permit the direct mission profile. (At least, that was the original plan. Like the American Apollo-Saturn program, they ended up with lunar-orbit rendezvous in their final plan.) Meanwhile, another prominent rocket designer, Chelomei, came up with his own vision: the UR-500 rocket. Neither rocket existed at that point. Both acquired political allies, and which plan was in ascendence generally depended on the politcal climate in the Kremlin. As a consequence, the efforts were effectively halved, which is probabl <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p> </p><p><font color="#666699"><em>"People assume that time is a strict progression of cause to effect, but actually from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint it's more like a big ball of wibbly wobbly . . . timey wimey . . . stuff."</em> -- The Tenth Doctor, "Blink"</font></p> </div>