Swan and Helix nebulas from A.S.I.G.N.

Status
Not open for further replies.
B

bloodhound31

Guest
Had another crack at the Swan tonight, with better results. <br /><br />Swan was 11 subs at 3 minutes each. <br /><br />Also did the Helix nebula, 12 Subs at 3 minutes.<br /><br />Imaging train: Canon 400D on Skywatcher ED80. Processed with Deep sky stacker and Photoshop. Manually tracked with Celestron Nexstar 11 GPS as Guide-scope.<br /><br /><br /><br />
url]
<br />
url]
 
M

MeteorWayne

Guest
You should probably just open one thread for your images, instead of a new one for each session, IMHO. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font color="#000080"><em><font color="#000000">But the Krell forgot one thing John. Monsters. Monsters from the Id.</font></em> </font></p><p><font color="#000080">I really, really, really, really miss the "first unread post" function</font><font color="#000080"> </font></p> </div>
 
D

deapfreeze

Guest
I do agree with MeteorWayne. Real nice photos though keep up the good work there at A.S.I.G.N. <img src="/images/icons/smile.gif" /> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font size="2" color="#0000ff"><em>William ( deapfreeze ) Hooper</em></font></p><p><font size="1">http://deapfreeze-amateur-astronomy.tk/</font></p><p> </p> </div>
 
B

bloodhound31

Guest
Yeah, good point fella's! I will do that from now on.<br /><br />Thanks!<br /><br />Baz.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

B
Replies
1
Views
681
K
B
Replies
4
Views
955
D
B
Replies
2
Views
536
Astronomy
bloodhound31
B
B
Replies
5
Views
968
I
B
Replies
3
Views
775
Astronomy
bloodhound31
B