Tachyons

[jatslo]

<font color="yellow">Well if they were created in a particle, I would assume you would be able to detect them if they were created, simply from Conservation of energy and Momentum. But if they did exist, they present a very interesting paradox if special relativity is to be believed(which for all intents and purposes it is). Maybe the creation of a tachyon places one in a non-inertial refrence frame where general relativity does not work, or tachyons are an artifact of us being in a non-inertial refrence frame kind of like the Centrifugal force. All wild speculation from me though... </font><br /><br />During particle annihilation, it would be possible to detect a tachyon burping upward into our universe as the following illustration suggests. However, the speed of impact would involve speeds greater than anyone is willing to concede to, because this will most likely equate to a paradox, in which the particle and tachyon, and/or their fragmentation switches sides briefly. A photon with zero mass and zero charge might succeed.

 

[jurgens]

jatslo just shut up, your post absolutely never makes sense, nor has any post you have ever made...<br /><br />btw just incase your too stupid to look it up, a photon has no charge or mass, nor has it ever had mass or charge...<br /><br />Jatslo Im really really tired of being nice to you... Get a book and read up...

 

[jatslo]

<font color="yellow">jatslo just shut up, your post absolutely never makes sense, nor has any post you have ever made... <br /><br />btw just incase your too stupid to look it up, a photon has no charge or mass, nor has it ever had mass or charge... <br /><br />Jatslo Im really really tired of being nice to you... Get a book and read up...</font><br /><br />Not very smart are you?

 

[dellcom200]

It is my understanding that, if tachyons exist, then they would travel faster than light and could never travel slower then C... <br /><br />so... how shall one go about catching somthing that moves faster then proven science allows?<br />

 

[najab]

><i>btw just incase your too stupid to look it up, a photon has no charge or mass, nor has it ever had mass or charge...</i><p>We told him this in another thread last week.</p>

 

[jatslo]

<font color="yellow">It is my understanding that, if tachyons exist, then they would travel faster than light and could never travel slower then C... so... how shall one go about catching somthing that moves faster then proven science allows?</font><br /><br />A = Acceleration<br />B = Speed of Tachyon<br />C = Speed of Light<br />D = Deceleration<br />P = Paradox<br />R = Rest<br />T = Time<br />U = Universe<br />X = Width<br />Y = Length<br />Z = Depth<br /><br />Can you do the rest in your head?

 

[jatslo]

<font color="yellow">>btw just incase your too stupid to look it up, a photon has no charge or mass, nor has it ever had mass or charge...<br /><br />We told him this in another thread last week.<br /></font><br /><br />He misquoted me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[jurgens]

JATSLO WTF?!<br /><br />you listed a bunch of variables which ummm aren't standard variables... D is not deccaration, not to mention you don't need a new variable for that since acceleration is a vector all you have to do is declare the direction.<br /><br />P = Paradox?<br />WTF?<br /><br />B = Speed of Tachyon? Where did you get this, out of your ass or something? AFAIK tachyons can have any speed above C, they don't have some max fixed speed.<br /><br />R = Rest?<br />umm no...<br /><br /><br />Hey I got a good one for you<br /><br />JATSLO= Don't Know Physics<br /><br /><br />Ohh and I did NOT misquote you.

 

[dellcom200]

"Hey I got a good one for you<br /><br />JATSLO= Don't Know Physics "<br /><br />agreed, i dont even get y he replied with a bunch of variables, it has nothing to do with my post what-so-ever

 

[jatslo]

F OFF, I can assign any freaking varible I want to, when I am making a diagram, so why don't you shut your feaking mouth you freaking idiot!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[jatslo]

You asked me a question, just so I can waste my time on another idiot.

 

[jurgens]

Sure you can... but don't expect any living human being to understand a thing your saying...

 

[dellcom200]

not that i want to get involved in this jatslo thing but...<br /><br />jatslo you seem to just say things for the sake of saying things, like y did u respond to my post with a list of variables that you made up and then ask me if i can do the rest in my head? that doesnt even make sense. please explain and notice how im not "flaming/yelling" so no need to get p1ss3d @ me

 

[jatslo]

I'm Flaming PISSED OFF!<br /><br />The image hasn't even loaded, yet.

 

[jatslo]

GET LOST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[jurgens]

The image has loaded... And umm you care to explain it becuase it makes absolutely no sense whatsoever..

 

[jatslo]

I'm NOT going to waste my time on STUPIDITY!!!!!<br /><br />GET LOST!!!!!!!!!

 

[jurgens]

what your not going to waste time on yourself anymore?<br /><br />Your getting lost?<br /><br />COOL!

 

[jatslo]

You're just a bunch of textbook-hugging, no-imagination, institution-parroting idiots.<br /><br />You have NO scientific abilities whatsoever!!!!!!

 

[jatslo]

You all just buried my post behind a bunch of trash, WTF!!!!!!!!!!!!! You sicko's!!!

 

[jatslo]

If I wanted this kind of crap, I would post in Yahoo!

 

[jatslo]

<font color="yellow">I rather enjoyed his comment that 'You have no scientific abilities whatsoever." <br /><br />Hmmm. IN psychology that's called 'projection', accusing others of what one most decidely is, in order to divert attention from the facts of the matter. <br /><br />I'd take any one of your posts, as being valued, compared to 100 of his. <br /><br />He just dcesn't get it, and probly never will. Whenever he gets caught, spewing, then he just responds with 'horse's a--, calling everyone else idiots or idiocies( projection) and lots of other ad hominem spew. Then accuses others of insulting him, rather than calling his posts what they are. It's common. <br /><br />After age 16-20 most personalities stabilize out and they are unable to change much. Thus the continued nonsense, wild claims and utter bilge. <br /><br />"But Hamlet, it is common to die." Hamlet's mother <br />"Aye, 'tis common." Hamlet</font>/safety_wrapper>

 

[Saiph]

Jatslo: Unfortunately, i don't see what your diagram is getting at. You've got two circles, and some labels. Diagrams <i>always</i> need an explaination. And just because you can draw it, doesn' tmake it true. Also, those variables of yours don't appear anywhere... <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p align="center"><font color="#c0c0c0"><br /></font></p><p align="center"><font color="#999999"><em><font size="1">--------</font></em></font><font color="#999999"><em><font size="1">--------</font></em></font><font color="#999999"><em><font size="1">----</font></em></font><font color="#666699">SaiphMOD@gmail.com </font><font color="#999999"><em><font size="1">-------------------</font></em></font></p><p><font color="#999999"><em><font size="1">"This is my Timey Wimey Detector.  Goes "bing" when there's stuff.  It also fries eggs at 30 paces, wether you want it to or not actually.  I've learned to stay away from hens: It's not pretty when they blow" -- </font></em></font><font size="1" color="#999999">The Tenth Doctor, "Blink"</font></p> </div>

 

[jatslo]

I'm to pissed off to do that now, thanx.

 

[kmarinas86]

Are you here to make money on the internet? You marketing specialist =P jatslo.com ? How much money do you make?