This is more of what I was talking about. I am surprised this site hasn't had more of exactly this kind of comment. I am surprised it hasn't.<br /><br />Wednesday, July 13, 2005<br />Deep Impact ... Deepening Contradictions<br />Well, it's been over a full week now -- more than seven days -- since NASA's Deep Impact Spacecraft slammed into Comet Tempel 1--<br /><br />And apparently kicked up a major firestorm ... on Earth.<br /><br />"Something's" definitely been happening, since the highly-publicized culmination of "Deep Impact" the other night, but NOT in public. Something that's potentially far more revealing than "just another successful NASA mission":<br /><br />A behind-the-scenes-eruption -- currently taking place in Washington and in Pasadena -- over precisely what Deep Impact actually ran into the other night ....<br /><br />How do we know that such "an intense backroom debate and controversey" is occurring inside NASA?<br /><br />One major clue has been the simple fact that -- unlike ALL previous NASA deep space missions the Space Agency has EVER conducted, over the last 40 or so years (of which I've been a witness to the majority, first-hand ...) -- "Deep Impact," following its Hollywood-like climax, has produced a stunning ... deafening ... totally anomalous--<br /><br />SILENCE.<br /><br />I mean -- no new images ... no spectra (!) ... no excited Mission scientists publicly going on and on about all the "marvelous new data" ... at the obligatory NASA press conferences ... where they could be questioned by equally excited members of the press. And -- most curiously--<br /><br />No one seems to want to talk about where the Spacecraft, still in excellent condition, could be sent to next!<br /><br />Such an "extended Deep Impact mission" was actively talked about pre-impact," as this story by Keith Cowing on SpaceRef.com confirms:<br /><br /><br /> "Over the past year or so, NASA has considered plans for an extended mission for Deep Impact to another comet after its baseline m