I recently ran across one. But for the most part, I don't think HBs think about it beyond Apollo 11. The only reason the person I mentioned thought shuttle flights were faked was that I asked if we didn't go to the moon, how are shuttle missions faked?<br /><br />This because of our stair step cautious approach to spaceflight which makes it highly unlikely any mission was real if Apollo was not. The HBs here seem to all be basing their conclusions on the Fox video or a couple of conspiracy web vids. They don't consider that we'd have to take small steps such as Mercury, Gemini, before undertaking Apollo. Or that its all based on well understood laws of physics as opposed to curing cancer which is poorly understood as its much more complicated than aeronautical engineering.<br /><br />One guy I talked to thought that all the landings were real except the first one. This makes no sense because if one could do the rest, why couldn't they do the first?<br /><br />And one right here a few posts ago said "There was no live coverage". I saw coverage when it was originally aired and in the case of later Apollo missions with improved camera capability, the coverage was long enough to look for obvious studio shoot edit points etc.<br /><br />I can't say 100% that man landed on the moon without going myself. But I've invested a lot of time studying more than one or two vids or listening to what someone else tells me and it appears man walked on the moon. Most HBs do not invest anywhere near as much effort in proving their cases as evidenced by the lame a** responses I see here. The HBs who do invest time and research are selling books, vids, etc and much of their research has been shown to be flawed. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><strong>My borrowed quote for the time being:</strong></p><p><em>There are three kinds of people in life. Those who make it happen, those who watch it happen...and those who do not know what happened.</em></p> </div>