I always liked Moonraker. What can I say; I was a little kid when it came out, and so the physics seemed entirely plausible. <img src="/images/icons/wink.gif" /> And it seemed quite technically feasible that a couple of miscreants could steal an orbiter by stowing away on it during a piggyback ferry flight on an SCA, firing up the main engines, and pulling away from the 747. <img src="/images/icons/tongue.gif" /> They are working for a supergenius bad guy, after all.<br /><br />(Cheesy movie. Obviously thrown into the 007 series as a response to Star Wars and the excitement surrounding the nascent Shuttle program. But it's got James Bond gadgetry, Richard Kiel, spaceships, space battles, and space shuttles. It's fun!) <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p> </p><p><font color="#666699"><em>"People assume that time is a strict progression of cause to effect, but actually from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint it's more like a big ball of wibbly wobbly . . . timey wimey . . . stuff."</em> -- The Tenth Doctor, "Blink"</font></p> </div>