Well, the thread wasn't meant to give us the possibility to talk about it(?)I find it amusing, that this thread is going in exactly the opposite direction to: "Could we be aliens?".
For grammarians, note the ? inside the quotes and a full stop (period) as well!
Reality=MARS as Kepler 425-b and Gliese 581d are not and will not be within reasonable travel distance & time allotment unless something unknown happens to solve that issue!We all should know Kepler 425-b and Gliese 581d, and many more, but would do you think would be the best candidate? Planet? Moon?
What do you think?
My personal opinion is on Gliese 581 g.
Correct me if I am wrong, I can notice a contraddiction. In the first part of the speech you tell us that there isn't the possibilty to reach Mars (as well as other exoplanets, and talking about exoplanets I agree); in the second part you talk about Mars as a possible place to make settlements (and even terraform the planet, something I'm not totally sure can happen).Reality=MARS as Kepler 425-b and Gliese 581d are not and will not be within reasonable travel distance & time allotment unless something unknown happens to solve that issue!
Mars has the proper size, water, habitable zone, slight atmosphere that could possibly be
terraformed over multiple decades or centuries, it's within reasonable travel distance to
Earth, yet far enough away to remain intact if unforeseen collisions happen to one planet or the other, we have the current tech to survive, and willing humans to go, and it makes sense to
insure the survivability of our species barring a planet ending disaster..!
This is worring and funny at the same time...It occurs to me that the best planet for human colonization is Earth. The only problem is that there are far too many people already on Earth. So perhaps one approach might be to convince a lot of Earth people to move out into the vast Cosmos to settle and despoil new planets. As a follow-up, those remaining on Earth could be convinced that the Earth will be unable to support humans in the immediate future. Thus, resource war would erupt further reducing population. When the proverbial "dust settles", perhaps a better form of Earth colonization could ensue. (That is until the Andromeda Galaxy and the Milky Way Galaxy play "back to back and belly to belly" in 3.5-4by). Let me use my house as an analogy. I keep fixing it up and keeping it habitable until it either falls down or I can sell it and leave. The Earth is the only home we have.
It also means be productive. Where many are not. They let others do that for them. And live off of them. Disabled is one thing, bums are not. I'm not going religious here, just stateing the truth. You do not produce more offspring than you can support. That's not religion, it's common sense ."When it was said be fruitful and multiply."
SomeTHING got it wrong, or was just plain ignorant.
Something probably being some ignorant clerk.
So... There is still hope!?but in reality humans would have to survive longer than the dinosaurs to stand any chance at that.
The problem is that we have to find a planet/moon/whatever is considered habitable as close as survivable. In other words, we have to find something that is habitable, of course, but even "reachable", if we find a planet/moon that we can get on, but this isn't so much habitable, we have to prefer it to a planet/moon that is more habitable than it but much farther away. Or at least, this is what I think.Find the closest planet/dwarf planet or moon with the most compatible environment to Earth and start there to see how it would be to establish a human colony but before that could be done a supply line would have to be put in place to shuttle food, supplies and other sustainables back and forth from Earth . As of right now I see this being 100-150 years in the future but who knows?
That's a good point!It also means be productive. Where many are not. They let others do that for them. And live off of them. Disabled is one thing, bums are not. I'm not going religious here, just stateing the truth. You do not produce more offspring than you can support. That's not religion, it's common sense .
That's incredible, and think, there is the possibility these stars aren't alone but with planets, this is incredible!The conclusion may surprise you as much as it did me:
"And astronomers believe there may be as many planets floating between stars as (there are) stars in our galaxy - or stars drifting between galaxies as (there are) galaxies in the Universe."