5 more planets... total 139

Status
Not open for further replies.
R

redracer02

Guest
http://planetquest.jpl.nasa.gov/news/5NewPlanets.html<br /><br /><font color="yellow">The new planets are:<br /><br /> * HD 183263 b, which has a minimum mass more than three times that of Jupiter and takes 634 days to complete an orbit;<br /> * HD 117207 B, which has a minimum mass about twice that of Jupiter and takes 2,627 days to complete an orbit;<br /> * HD 188015 b, which has a minimum mass only slightly greater than Jupiter, is located at a similar distance from its star as the Earth is from the Sun, and takes 456 days to complete an orbit;<br /> * HD 45350 b, which is slightly smaller in mass than Jupiter, and takes 891 days to complete an orbit; and<br /> * HD 99492 b, which has a relatively low minimum of mass, about 36 times that of Earth and takes 17 days to compete an orbit. </font>/safety_wrapper>
 
F

fear

Guest
<blockquote><font class="small">In reply to:</font><hr /><p>Planet Type: Water Giant <p><hr /></p></p></blockquote><br />It's made out of water??? <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>
 
T

thalion

Guest
Re astrophoto:<br />I think that article refers more to brown dwarfs than the currently-known exoplanets. IIRC, most of the brown dwarfs and free-floating planets we've found have been found by direct imaging, while pretty much all of the exoplanets have been found by indirect methods. <br /><br />Also, the impression I'm getting is that that webmaster refers to any gas giant in the habitable zone of its parent star as a "water giant." That's just his term.
 
F

fear

Guest
That's an awsome website. It says there was an unconfirmed sighting of an earth sized planet 7830000000 light years away! I never heard about that at all. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>
 
R

robnissen

Guest
An earth sized planet spotted 7.8 BILLION light years away. I don't think so, its hard enough to see galaxies that far away.
 
A

astrophoto

Guest
That website does go so far as to explicitely state:<br /><br />"Planet Appearance: White Water Ice Clouds"<br /><br />That's quite a property to 'infer'!!
 
5

5stone10

Guest
That is a cool website - but I think that earth-size planet was spotted briefly through gravitational lensing. So there's no chance of confirming the find.
 
P

peacekeeper

Guest
Toymaker, you seem to have linked twice to the same planet.<br /><br /><blockquote><font class="small">In reply to:</font><hr /><p>It's made out of water???<p><hr /></p></p></blockquote><br />Quite a few gas giants seem to consist of water. Last time I checked that site, I think I counted 53 water giants out of 134 planets, or something like that.
 
N

nexium

Guest
Hi thalion: How many free floating planets and how many brown dwarfs have we found? Is it classed as a brown dwarf if it has ten to eighty times the mass of Jupiter? Neil
 
5

5stone10

Guest
I've got it as ~13 to 75 Jupiter masses.<br /><br />Here's a CalTech site with 'Masses and Orbital Characteristics of Extrasolar Planets' of the 110 that they have listed. None is greater that 17 Jupiter masses />>><br />http://exoplanets.org/massradiiframe.html<br />
 
A

astrophoto

Guest
I thought that free-floater was challenged as having belonged to a system in Orion. I could be thinking of a different one though.
 
5

5stone10

Guest
As to Gas Giant occurrence - Lick, Keck, et al. planet search [~1000 star survey written up in 2004] provides a statistically [fairly] valid correlation between metallicity and detection of Gas Giants. "Stars with solar metallicity have a planet occurrence rate of 5-10%." >>><br />http://exoplanets.org/science.html
 
J

jatslo

Guest
A planet does not require a Sun to warm the environment. The thermal properties of its liquid core could regulate tempatures near its surface as well.<br /><br />Highly volcanic planetary bodies could have warmer atmospheres.<br /><br />What do you Think?<br /><br />--- http://jatslo.com/ : Jatslo
 
V

vogon13

Guest
The only sensible investment:<br /><br /><br /><br /> REAL ESTATE! <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font color="#ff0000"><strong>TPTB went to Dallas and all I got was Plucked !!</strong></font></p><p><font color="#339966"><strong>So many people, so few recipes !!</strong></font></p><p><font color="#0000ff"><strong>Let's clean up this stinkhole !!</strong></font> </p> </div>
 
R

redracer02

Guest
I still think the sun would have to do most of the warming. On these 2 that are in the habitable zone the temps are either below freezing on one or just under earth like on the other. A moon around the earth like temp one could possibly be habitable.<br /><br />Man I can't wait for these space telescopes that will hopefully be able to see the planets.
 
N

nexium

Guest
My guess is volanoes, guysers and earthquakes are likely to be a major hazzard, if the planet has enough internal heat to warm the surface to 273 k = zero c. The atmosphere is likely to average 90 degrees f = 50 degrees c cooler (than the surface) without a sun. Neil
 
J

jatslo

Guest
Hostile environments to what?<br /><br />If were talking basic primordal soup, then microbiology is highly likely.<br /><br />Do these new spaced based telescopes have thermal imaging capabilities? <br /><br />--- http://jatslo.com/ : Jatslo
 
L

larper

Guest
These are exciting finds. <br /><br />The program started out finding the real bizarre cases, because those were the quickest to identify themselves. <br /><br />Now they are starting to find Jupiter sized planets in Jupiter sized orbits. This is huge. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><strong><font color="#ff0000">Vote </font><font color="#3366ff">Libertarian</font></strong></p> </div>
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts