<font color="yellow">The white material clearly blankets the surface, masking small scale underlying features such as ground patterning but not medium to large features like dunes. From this I would suggest than the white material is 10's of cm to metres thick, but not hundreds of m, as nature article suggests (could that be a typo?). Snow is the most likely explanation, as it is much thicker than the frosting on the walls. </font><br /><br />Steve and Jon, I too had the very same distinct impression of thin ice and could not understand why the Nature article suggested the ice was hundreds of meters thick.<br /><br />I think the concentric rings could be formed by changes in the "shoreline" as the ice thickness grew or fell. The visible shoreline could be the result of windblown dust caking up against the ice deposit, and then perhaps being fixed in place due to the formation of a salt crust on the dust surface. If the ice later sublimes, this would leave a ring in the dust at the old shoreline, and a new shoreline could form at the new edge-of-the-ice location.<br /><br />I don't know the mechanism of the ice increasing in thickness. I really doubt liquid water ever existed, as some have suggested. I assume it is most likely that the ice increased in thickness due to slow accretion of water vapor from the atmosphere during colder times.<br /><br />Perhaps very careful examination could show that the formation of the concentric rings from ancient shorelines of ice is correlated to changes in Martian obliquity and the resultant different climatic conditions. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature" align="center"><em><font color="#0000ff">- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -</font></em> </div><div class="Discussion_UserSignature" align="center"><font color="#0000ff"><em>I really, really, really miss the "first unread post" function.</em></font> </div> </div>