<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>Tests for the signatures of life conducted by the Viking landers came out positive (at least, 2 of the 3 tests did), but this was thought to be because the soil probably contained highly oxidising chemicals. However, results from Phoenix now indicate that you could grow vegetables in it. I take this to mean that it is life-friendly and isn’t highly oxidising (can anyone confirm that MECA or TEGA would definitely detect such compounds?). So, assuming that martian arctic soil is similar to that at the Viking sites, what implications does this have for the Viking life-test results?Thanks in anticipation. <br />Posted by crazyfrog</DIV></p><p>Well, only one Viking experiment cme baack positive, of the others one was negative and two were ambigious. Overal the results, including the apparent positive, could best be explained, as you said, by chemistry.</p><p>The actual amount of oxidants neeed to create the Viking results are quite small, I don't know how this cmpares with the results from Viking. they my be compatible, on the other hand they may show the soil is heterogeneous, which is not suprising.</p><p>Jon<br /></p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><em>Whether we become a multi-planet species with unlimited horizons, or are forever confined to Earth will be decided in the twenty-first century amid the vast plains, rugged canyons and lofty mountains of Mars</em> Arthur Clarke</p> </div>