If RCH respected himself and his "work" he might want to consider concentrating on making it palatable and presentable to academia, even if he had to spoon feed them a bit at a time with excellent and well written though incremental whitepapers. <br /><br />The evolution of knowlege proceeds by leaps and bounds, not by gradual progression and usually those who are on the leading edge like Galileo, Bohm, Pauli, Bruno suffer a lot before they are recognized, if they survive to see it.<br /><br />At the same time, the reason that Galileo, Bohm and Pauli and Bruno were finally respected as visionary was because of the careful work they undertook to develop their science.<br /><br />RCH has not been at all careful with his image and has shown little respect for himself. The last time I looked at his site(before 5min ago), 5-6years ago, it was loaded with references and comparisons to Egyptian mythology and attempts to link it all together in some grand, conspiratorial scheme...<br /><br />Sorry, I have my hands full with exploring the potentials of entanglement theory, UAP investigation and protecting my credibility and image while working on it...<br /><br />Heck, I am not even an academic but I know how NOT to do it... just take my lesson from the likes of RCH, Skeptical Inquirer, MUFON, Raelians, the Catholic Church, Jeff Rense and others.....