I'm pretty sure that the media is trying to make a mountain out of a molehill.....<br /><br />I see two separate issues in the same statement, the damage was very small... <br /><br />It probably is and it will probably not be a problem.<br /><br />I'm pretty sure that the media is trying to make a mountain out of a molehill....<br /><br />I haven't seen the media having that much interest anyway. The point is it offers an opportunity to test procedures and equipment that a lot of money has been spent on. Odds are great that they would land with little, or at best, minor damage.<br /><br />That damage would occur during a repair makes you wonder if we should keep humans involved. Can't you add attachments, like they do in surgery?<br /><br />As clear as the picture was it should be simple to add a squirter. Fill it up to a little below full and move to the next damaged area. If that works Shuttle could fly for a long time.<br /><br />Once damage become a non-issue, and a controllable problem, the remaining Shuttles could fly for a long time. The airframes and crew/cargo areas seem to be aging well, engines are fine. A better Launcher would be nice.<br /><br /> <br /> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>