From a drop of water....

[Atlan0001]

With what I read here and there again and again I must press it again!

Time dilation is not a physic separate from SPACETIME's "distance-time"! The time it takes light's pictures to cover varying distances of space! Time dilation is a matter of the constant of the speed of light, as slow as it is covering the universe [ NOT local-relative ] developing coordinate points past-future histories (the "observable universe") behind the times of the entangling spontaneously concurrent (t=0) REALTIME NOW (t=0) object universe!

"Time dilation" is part and parcel the picture map of the territory and the map is not the territory . . . is never the territory (to include any kind of travelers as intrinsically pieces of the territory the observable map at the constant of the speed of light cannot possibly keep up with at any increasing or decreasing distance in space . . . an always accelerating (going away) or decelerating (oncoming) difference in distance-time from the map (from the "observable universe"))!

Once more! Time dilation is not the unobservable reality of the territory, just the asymptotic reality of the local-relative observed map of the territory!
=====================

(Observable time dilation -->> Going away -->>)

General topology - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

(Observable time dilation <<-- Oncoming <<--)
=====================

The territory is never absolute to the time under observation at any distance by observers. Bespeaking "time dilation" is an attempt to make the observation of time at a distance the absolute of concurrent time with the observer's time at a distance! Differing object speeds is really differing local-relative magnitudes of universe . . . and the constant of the speed of light in a vacuum is physically constant to the magnitude throughout all the infinity of possible fractal zooms structure of universe magnitudes. The Heisenberg principle of uncertainty (principle of indeterminacy of velocities and/or positions) will apply!

=====================

Inverse-square law - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

=====================

 

[Atlan0001]

This belongs here to:

Referring to chained posts (#23 to #21, ...) in thread 'Past the speed of light':

Question - Past the speed of light

What would happen if there are multiple different speed combining to be greater than the speed of light? EX Revolution speed of our moon around earth = A Revolution speed of Earth around the sun = B Revolution speed of the sun around the milky way = C The movement speed of the milky way...

forums.space.com

 

[Atlan0001]

Two things I consider myself an expert in besides infinity, infinities, eternity, the offset circles of times (including a circle of radius), spontaneity, instantaneity, histories, cosmology, and metaphysics. Those two things: The 'Theory of Chaos' and, with it, the 'Science of Complexity'.
===========================
"(including the circle of radius)"
To me, a self-similarity in being....

Strong interaction - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

===========================
----------------------------

"Please don't ask me about what I said before I knew better!" -- Albert Einstein.
---------------------------------

"From a drop of water, a logician could infer the possibility of an Atlantic or a Niagara without having seen or heard of one or the other...." -- 'Sherlock Holmes: A Study in Scarlet', by Arthur Canon Doyle.

 

[Atlan0001]

Fractal:

Fractal - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

The above speaks to fractals going "arbitrarily small" as in reaching toward the infinitesimal. About face, so to speak, and the fractal will go arbitrarily large as in reaching toward the infinite.

Take away the finite middle, the relative, and there is no difference whatsoever except facing between infinite and infinitesimal. However infinite, turnabout face is toward infinitesimal. However infinitesimal, turnabout face is infinite.

So, both infinite and infinitesimal can be, and must be, fractal-realized to be within any finite . . . and vice-versa!

 

[Atlan0001]

I had this elsewhere but it belongs here also:

I can't remember if it was Kip Thorn or someone else, whom I read, said our current realization of physics, and our current mathematical descriptions, may not be good enough to describe the reality of the universe.

 

[Atlan0001]

Time becomes amazingly simple when you realize it really begins and ends right now in the trunk middle ground always (entangling spontaneously concurrent (t=0) REALTIME NOW (t=0) instant moment of all mass-energy (='0')).

Like the magnetic moment, the dipole moment, the past-future equatorial point is now ((t=0) REALTIME NOW (t=0)) . . . the past is now ((t=0) REALTIME NOW (t=0)) . . . the future is now ((t=0) REALTIME NOW (t=0)).

As I have it, in league with closed up superposition "collapsed cosmological constant (/\) (P) (BC) (BB) 'Mirror Event Horizon' of the infinities of horizon universes (u) (universe horizons)," aka the 'Infinite MULTIVERSE Universe' (U), it makes for a solid base resultant {timeless forever} constant of fundamental physics and/or natural laws.

Again:
Time becomes amazingly simple when you realize it really begins and ends right now in the trunk middle ground always (entangling spontaneously concurrent (t=0) REALTIME NOW (t=0) instant moment of all mass-energy (='0')).