From a drop of water....

[Atlan0001]

"Repetition is the heart of instruction." Gen. George S. Patton, Jr.
------------------------------

I've found over the coarse of time what deals in time dilation and it isn't any object traveler:

Light at the constant of the speed of light takes a longer and longer SPACETIME to cross a lengthening or longer distance of SPACE, thus (light itself the thing) dealing in time dilation across a lengthening divide.

Light itself deals in time dilation over lengthening distances, thus though holding to a constancy of speed, does not, cannot, hold to it over changes in space and time. Light's speed, itself, would be infinity if could measure space and time distance to cross it instantly (as some think (unable to envision differently), and tell us regularly in cosmological captions, it does ("an astronomical event just observed 70,000 light years away just happened" (thus no intervening time difference in the observation of it)!

A traveler (and not light at the speed of light) will split universes of observation into two or more universes dealing in a macrocosmic self-similar representation of the microcosmic Heisenberg uncertainty principle.

Once more, photonic photo-frame light itself is the only traveler that will always slow down or speed up in aging according to the divide crossed.
---------------------------------

"Communication across the revolutionary divide is inevitably partial." -- Thomas S. Kuhn.

 

[Harry Costas]

Science is moving forward
Quantum Mechanics
https://search.app/3VfEAfyWVSDPApJL9

 

[Atlan0001]

It is possible that galaxies, and universes, too, split in two or more from energy accumulation (over energizing) just like other cells (such as cells of life), nova, do.

 

[Harry Costas]

We know how Galaxies form.
Elliptical, Bar, Spiral, and exotic ones.
It's just amazing what man can achieve in the modern Era.
We know how they merge
We know how they can be pulled by other galaxies to pieces.
We can also determine the ages of galaxies.

 

[Atlan0001]

We know how Galaxies form.
Elliptical, Bar, Spiral, and exotic ones.
It's just amazing what man can achieve in the modern Era.
We know how they merge
We know how they can be pulled by other galaxies to pieces.
We can also determine the ages of galaxies.

You only think we know and that we can, Harry. Neither you nor "we" are gods, Harry.

 

[Harry Costas]

We do have theories based on science.

The last time I looked, I was not a GOD.
Tomorrow is another day.

 

[Atlan0001]

We do have theories based on science.

The last time I looked, I was not a GOD.
Tomorrow is another day.

Also "science" . . . real science!!!!

"... the ... threat was insignificant, not to say non-existent, the measures to meet it proposed ... were therefore completely meaningless. A strictly logical conclusion, such as madmen are liable to arrive at after starting from radically wrong premises, ..." -- Helmuth von Moltke.

Strictly logical conclusions, such as 'scientists' (gods of science in one field of science or another) are liable to arrive at after starting from radically wrong premises. Their houses built on shifting sands.

 

[Atlan0001]

From 0-d point to magnitudinous omni-directional 2-d Flatland, the 3-d self-similar fractal zooms structure of universe and return:

(A timeless SPACE, the Final Frontier):

==================

Inverse-square law - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

==================

Strong interaction - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

==================

Cantor set - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

==================

Klein bottle - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

==================

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pCpLWbHVNhk&list=RDQM1clBN09py6s&index=12

==================
------------------------------

"From a drop of water, a logician could infer the possibility of an Atlantic or a Niagara without having seen or heard of one or the other...." -- 'Sherlock Holmes: A Study in Scarlet', by Arthur Canon Doyle.

 

[Atlan0001]

Ad#909:

Counterintuitively, there is nothing like the accelerating expansion of the universe . . . er, rather an accelerating expansion into the universe! What I call gravitational expansion into the open, the opening, system without bottom, without top, without end (#909: "From 0-d point to magnitudinous omni-directional 2-d Flatland, the 3-d self-similar fractal zooms structure of universe and return.")!

 

[Atlan0001]

All particle-waves in all the universes are their own mirror anti (mirror their anti)! Result: Grand total of mass energy and mass matter equals unsigned finite '1' and/or infinite '0' . . . ((+1) (-1)) = 1/0)!

The illustrations!
=======================

https://www.space.com/the-universe/cosmic-inflation-did-the-early-cosmos-balloon-in-size-a-mirror-universe-going-backwards-in-time-may-be-a-simpler-explanation

=======================

Standing wave - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

=======================

 

[Atlan0001]

As always, "Brevity is the soul of wit but repetition is the heart of instruction." -- Gen. George S. Patton, Jr.

Stephen Hawking's "Grand Central Station of the Universe (U)" in which the Cosmic All (the Cosmopolis) exists surrounding and always flowing underneath its centrally located particularly singular single-handed clock frozen as to time at an infinite trunk present (an instant moment) of time (t=0)....

As opposed to the coordinate points past-future histories ((t=+1) (t=-1)) of SPACETIME, (t=0) stands for the ['infinite trunk present'] of entangled, entangling, spontaneously concurrent (t=0) REALTIME NOW (t=0) instant moment of each and every immediate universe (u) of an infinity of immediate universes in the 'Infinite MULTIVERSE Universe (U) of All Time (of all times , , , the infinite density -- aka infinite zeroing -- of all mirroring past-future histories ("the future is the past") ("the past is the future") ("a standing wave')).

Now that fuzzy cloud infinity closes up in a Trojan superposition singularity set (unsigned '1'), the collapsed cosmological constant (/\) Planck (BC) (BB) 'Mirror Event Horizon', indistinguishable from "nowhereland" and "nothingness" but as smoothly highly energetic and, always, as hot as hell (a "Schrodinger's cat" far to the outside of the box (also far to the inside of the box (thus, at once, again far to the outside of the box)), don't you know).
------------------------------------

"History always repeats in large aspect, though rarely if ever in fine detail." -- Attributed to historian Will Durant.

 

[Atlan0001]

Copied over from elsewhere to add to #911 above with more to add to it, maybe:

"There is relative materialism so fine as to be utterly transparent in universe grids but still have energy to its magnitudinous omni-directional Flatland mass. Relative materialism filling universes to an infinite holographical density of photonic photo frames, and filling universes with energy throughout. The materialism we can't observationally discern for what it is except in and as the local-relative "observable universes," the equivalent energy (energies) of it being an entirely different matter."

I, in my own view of things, once more may have just brought back a kind of quantum "ether" ("aether"), Einstein claimed as being redundant to his invariance of relativity. And I see that it also ties to the Flatland universe 'Mandelbrot set', it goes that materially broad and deep "fine."

 

[Atlan0001]

Watching a video from Astrum ("This Insane Timelapse from Hubble Will Change Your Perspective of the Speed of Light"), it began with a line I've pressed many times . . . to the effect that:

"Light may seem instantaneous to us, but over astronomical distances it's really quite slow." And that it is. Over astronomical distances (increasing or decreasing) it's "time dilated" (though in fact constant, always slowing down in covering lengthening astronomical distances / always speeding up in covering shortening astronomical distances)!!!!

I've gone into what and why many times before here and elsewhere, so I feel no need at this time to go into it. People who can think more than 1-dimensionally, actually more than 2-dimensionally, should know already the astro-dynamics of the what and the why of light, and thus any light image, apparently slowing down and apparently speeding up regarding time!

Time is the hard that shatters into bits (coordinate points), like glass and diamonds. Space is the soft (think gravity) that can be manipulated (accelerating expansions / accelerating contractions / hyperspace / subspace / black holes / wormholes / macrocosm / microcosm / ....)!!!!

 

[Atlan0001]

Albert Einstein: "God does not play dice with the universe!"
Stephen Hawking's response decades later: "Yes, God does play dice with the universe but they're loaded!"

So, according to Albert there is only one box for Schrodinger's cat and only one life (meaning only one time, absolute (a static universe)).
So, according to Stephen there are at least nine boxes for Schrodinger's cat and nine lives to live (meaning at least nine paths, at least nine spaces, at least nine times. at least nine paralleling universes, at least nine choices) and the cat will take one and all of them (will have taken all of them spontaneously every instant moment (t=0) of time)).

Thus, the brain is mortal, is finite, the mind is not finite.

Appeal to the stone - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Thus the universe (the finite) is mortal, meaning it is ever changing; The nine (the infinity, including in closed up 'Trojan' superposition "infinite (.../finite ('Trojan')) set") is not finite.

Infinite set - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

--------------------------------

"From a drop of water...."

 

[Atlan0001]

Ad#914 (a pointer to a separate post in a separate thread that chains here):

Where did the universe's magnetic fields come from?

How the universe got its large magnetic fields has remained one of the stickiest outstanding problems in astrophysics. Now, researchers have proposed a novel solution: a giant "dust battery" operating when the first stars appeared. Where did the universe's magnetic fields come from? : Read more

forums.space.com

 

[Atlan0001]

The galaxy spins on an axis like the Earth spinning on an axis, and the magnetic field of the Earth is as flat through the equatorial disk of it as is the galaxy through the equatorial disk of it (the solar system moving around with the galaxy disk (its own disk spinning perpendicular to the galactic disk), coming around in spin cycle to here in the universe every 230, 000, 000 years (supposedly), the Earth 'come around' spin cycle being, of course, 24 hours, Earth orbiting the sun in spin cycle each Earth year.

How fast and how far through the universe does an Einstein move standing still at a stop sign by a railroad track with a train passing by? How fast and how far through the universe of such varied movements, such varied speeds, at large does light at a constant of the speed of light in a vacuum travel (being measured so astronomically slow, and slower, as it is)?

 

[Atlan0001]

Ad#913 and #916, plus other posts having bearing:

It is the speed of light itself that suffers time dilation, causing the split screen between the universe of relativity, the observable universe always of past histories, (t=+1 (the arrived)) and the universe of concurrently occurring realities, the universe of future histories (t=-1 (this way coming / the enroute)) at any distance whatsoever from observers!

"The map is not the territory" (the map is never the territory mapped)!
--------------------------------

"Repetition is the heart of instruction." -- Gen. George S. Patton, Jr.

 

[Atlan0001]

"From a dab of entropy, a meta-physicist logician could infer the probability constant of Newton's equilibrium without having seen or heard of one constant of extreme or the other." -- The Trojan!

 

[Atlan0001]

Had this play -- on my modeling -- elsewhere but thought it would be better in the theatre here:

Try a fundamental binary base2, '1' and/or '0' where '1' represents fire (the forced extreme of heat) and '0' represents fire (sic) (the forced extreme of cold), exactly the same extreme of force and energy requirement to fire, entropy being to the Trojan of Newton's vision of equilibrium ((+1) <--> (Temperate Zone) <--> (-1)). The Planck Horizon of heat (unsigned '1') basing it all.

Hawking's temperate zone, the Trojan, what he called the "Life Zone", Einstein's cosmological constant of "stasis", cannot exist without the concomitant existence of the forced extremes (the absolutes that try to eat one another but never quite make it . . . resulting in Einstein's cosmological stasis constant of Newton's equilibrium in entropic temperate zone, equating to Hawking's constant of "Life Zone". Aka an equatorial "Flatland Universe." Aka the trunk of the tree branching all of the limbs . . . I mean all of them (the branching of the tree always feeding back to the trunk of the tree)!!!!
===============
E=mc^2
**Trojan**
M=e/c^2
===============
((+1) (-1)) = 1/0.


--------------------------------

"Brevity may be the soul of wit but repetition is the heart of instruction." -- Gen. George S. Patton, Jr.

 

[Atlan0001]

Ad#919, among so many others:

c=speed of light in a vacuum.
c^2=speed of light in a vacuum squared.

Thus I realize what has been in the back of my mind all the while I've danced around it so many times (that it, "emission" in reference, goes a bit broader and deeper in universal meaning and a big-time representation):
c='creation' (C='Creation').
c^2='creation' squared (C^2='Creation' squared).

 

[Atlan0001]

The three, "SPACE," "REALTIME NOW," and the Trojan, "SPACETIME," are three individual entities and not one and the same entity ("SPACETIME") they are made out to be. The two former are infinite and eternal, SPACE (t=0) having no beginning or end, REALTIME NOW being spontaneously concurrent (t=0) instant moment (an infinite, eternal, present). The third and Trojan, SPACETIME (most particularly inclusive of c='creation' (C='Creation')), being finite bit.

The speed of light in a vacuum, 'c' ('C'), is two dimensional entities, not just one. It is local-relative ceiling velocity (c=186,000mps (300,000kps)), absolutely crushing, smashing, in its relative black hole electromagnetic entity (long blamed on gravity). The other is, it is a place, a positional placement (c='creation' (C='Creation'), always in creation(s)), coordinate points past-future histories (t=+1) (t=-1)) discrete quanta SPACETIME holographical "observable universe(s)".

Once more, the three, "SPACE," "REALTIME NOW," and the Trojan, "SPACETIME," are three individual entities and not one and the same entity ("SPACETIME") they are made out to be.

 

[Atlan0001]

ad#921:

The so-called "early universe" is actually a paralleling higher energy universe to ours, as is also an equally so-called later universe a paralleling higher energy universe. Life lives always exactly where entropy tends: Newton's universe of equilibrium / Einstein's static cosmological constant universe / Hawking's "life Zone" universe. Those three, the same one, and the other two, the earlier and the later, also probably one and the same paralleling higher plane of energy to our lower plane of lower energy . . . matching the quantum realm energy planes precisely for also being quantum realm. At once the fundamental binary base2 two fractal zooms planes, the alternating smooth and the coarse grain chunky, of Complexity and Chaos.

In continuum, at once, Cantor set . . . and Mandelbrot set . . . and Menger sponge. (refer back among so many builds of the modeling, to particularly #908-#910.)

 

[Atlan0001]

Definitely needed to be added, in total from elsewhere, into the modeling done herein:

It was Stephen Hawking who told a bunch of panicking mathematical physicists not to worry about having reduced the universe to zero. . . that the grand total of all mass matter and energy making up the universe, period, already reduces to zero (and, thus, never anything but zero for a cosmic grand total of all (thus an overall density of infinite '0' . . . versus the finite of '1' in the fundamental binary base2 of 'immaterialism' ('0') and/or 'materialism' ('1'))).

(*Philosopher Bishop George Berkeley versus Dr. Samuel Johnson kicking the stone, somewhere circa 1763-1767CE????*)
--------------------------------

"Brevity may be the soul of wit but repetition is the heart of instruction." -- Gen. George S. Patton, Jr.

 

[Atlan0001]

Revamped to improve clarity, I hope:

If I made up two columns under the fundamental binary base2 headings "Immaterialism ('0')" and "Materialism ('1')", I would have to place both Einstein's "Relativity Theories", particularly the Trojan dimensionality of SPACETIME as I have it, in the first column (as a Berkeley "immaterialism"), and 'Quantum Mechanics' in the second column (as Johnson "kicking the stone of materialism"). Both equally dealing in realities in their differing and opposing ways.

Maybe I should add a prefix and/or suffix of 'MATRIX' (after the movie 'The Matrix') to 'SPACETIME' as I have it!
(MATRIX SPACETIME)
Or....
(SPACETIME MATRIX (better I think.... and, actually, potentially "inertialess", among a few other sudden realizations to be transferred from second to first column, or first to second, in my modeling, too, remembering SPACETIME, now SPACETIME MATRIX, is always the Trojan:

1.) SPACE (t='1').
2.) REALTIME NOW (t='0').
3.) And the Trojan SPACETIME MATRIX; Einstein's coordinate points past-future histories ((t=+1) (t=-1)).