Magnetism! Electric! And there is no microcosmic / macrocosmic limit to its potential, though always finite potential reaches (unlike self-similar fractal fabric hyperspace / subspace "zooms" gravity (antigravity) infinities . . . infinite and infinitesimal)!Yes, there are cases where electrons will pair up to form Cooper pairs as the electrons travel through a matrix. This is due to their spin alignment and the influence of the surrounding atoms. Columb repulsion is still there, just overcome.
Of course."Universe itself is infinite."
What about vacuum energy? It exists in the 'nothingness' of pure vacuum. It's an artifact of the infinite distance, nothing else."Since we cannot create matter or energy from nothing."
So what? That doesn't prove there's no infinity. Sifi cheers from Allen Somerset, writer of "Brave New Mars" novel.Every object out there regardless of its size has a finite body.
So, objects cannot have an infinite body."
I'm pretty sure Harry doesn't deny the existence of infinities. I think he is more less backing me up in my counterintuitive claim that the infinite content of a finite container can and will be nonlocally, non-relatively, infinitely greater than the local, relative, finite container. "Infinity of the mind." Infinity within bodies (such as the possibility of Hawking's countless "baby universes" fading away infinitesimally (therefore infinitely) from the finite in space and time). "Infinities on (and in) the head of a pin." Perturbations. Chaos Theory's "self-similar fractal zooms universe structure" out of its fundamental base "set and reset." A gravitational (antigravitational) ("zooms") / strong binding (nuclear) force (base "set and reset") . . . also to be realized as 'Casimir effect and force' . . . match up.Of course.
What about vacuum energy? It exists in the 'nothingness' of pure vacuum. It's an artifact of the infinite distance, nothing else.
So what? That doesn't prove there's no infinity. Sifi cheers from Allen Somerset, writer of "Brave New Mars" novel.
I have an answer for you, Harry, since you ask. An answer you of all people can understand. Because of the 'Klein bottle' and Schrodinger's "cat" illustration too, just as you can fit countless "finites" within "infinite", you can fit countless "infinites" within "finite." And they will still be -- they will still remain -- equal but opposites always.How on Earth did people ever think that the universe was finite.
Yes!!
How on Earth?
The twists (both plural and singular at the same time) of the 'Klein bottle' of the Planck (Big Bang) Horizon inside everything in and of the Universe, and the Big Bang (Planck) Horizon outside everything in and of the Universe . . . all at once!Thats a twist in a bottle
Non- relative nonlocally (infinite, infinitesimal, outside / inside, singular and plural open system), yes. Locally relative (closed systemic finite), no. Matter / anti-matter by very dimensional definition is locally relative and thus closed systemically finite. Since energy is a mass equivalent to mass matter, it follows relativity.Hello Atlan001
Trying to follow your logic.
Space is infinite, yes?
Matter in space is infinite, Yes?
we will most likely never know the answer to that fascinating question.Infinity or not infinity that is the question.
Universe itself is infinite.
All matter in the universe is and always will be.
Since we cannot create matter or energy from nothing.
We cannot destroy matter or energy.
Every object out there regardless of its size has a finite body.
So, objects cannot have an infinite body.
What happens to all bodies in an infinite universe?
They cannot hide or pretend to be Dark matter/energy.
So, we research and study applying whatever science we have at hand to explain the transformation from one phase to another.
This leads to various theories, some scientific and many based on opinions.
When we observe images out there and beyond, we notice clustering.
But! we expected expansion.
What is actually going on?
New one parameter family of exact solutions in General Relativity with a scalar field is found. The metric is of Liouville type which admits complete separation of variables in the geodesic Hamilton--Jacobi equation. This solution exists for the exponential potential for a scalar field and is invariant with respect to global Lorentz transformations. It describes, in particular, a black hole formation as well as a naked singularity. Solutions corresponding to the naked singularity describe accelerating expansion of the homogeneous and isotropic Universe, and can be smoothly continued along geodesics to infinite past without Big Bang.
Numerical modeling of a mathematical model of the cosmological evolution of an asymmetric scalar doublet with kinetic interaction between the components was carried out. A wide range of values of fundamental parameters and initial conditions of the model are considered. Various types of behavior have been identified: models with an infinite inflationary past and future - with and without a rebound point, models with a finite past and infinite future, with an infinite past and finite future (Big Rip), as well as models with a finite past and future. Based on numerical analysis, the behavior of models near the initial singularity and the Big Rip is studied; it is shown that in both cases the barotropic coefficient tends to unity, which corresponds to an extremely rigid state of matter near singularities. A numerical example of the cosmological generation of the classical component of a scalar doublet by its phantom component is given. An assessment was made of the creation of the velocity of fermion pairs by a scalar field near the rebound points and it was shown that a scalar field at the cold stage of the Universe can ensure the creation of the required number of massive scalarly charged fermions. Keywords: cosmological model, phantom and classical scalar fields, quality analysis, asymptotic behavior, numerical modelling, scalar field generation, types of behavior.
I'm willing to go for one possible answer: Because, Harry, of the relative depth of the macrocosmic 'cone' universe to a 'point!' along every spoke-line up and out and the relative depth of the microcosmic 'cone' universe to a 'point!' along every spoke-line down and in. From out of the cone's point at the cone's other end from us along every spoke-line, what should we observe that end of the universe appear to issue us but exactly what we do observe accelerating in expansion of cone's accelerating opening toward us?!The question begs.
Why does man want to see a finite universe?
Why does man want to see a creation, a Big Bang Theory come to light?
Come on, Harry, this involving infinity, plus, isn't a Lab based provable! Everything having to do with the reality of unobservable universes (u), and an unobservable Infinite MULTIVERSE Universe (U) in superposition will stay unprovable until we actually get out there into the vastly wider, larger, universe and begin to piece it together. Otherwise, the only way to go after it is the macrocosm's actual physical model, the quantum complexity and chaos of the microcosm.Hello Atlan
You write so well I was ready to believe in your writing.
It sounds like you are right.
And yet
I need evidence.
I need to see the putting so to speak.