Moon Landings Faked? (and all other space mission fakery)

[amshak]

Re: Moon Landings Faked?

Moon Landing is not faked . What about the soil Samples ? Whithin next 15 years , India , China , Russia are going to make their landings .

 

[Smersh]

Re: Moon Landings Faked?

Yes and it seems likely that private outfits like Richard Branson and others will land there too. Seems it will be hard for the hardline hoax believers to keep spouting their nonsense after all that, but I suppose they will think of something. They always do ... :roll:

 

[rocketmonkey]

Re: Moon Landings Faked?

The Mythbusters busted faked moon landings.

 

[warpfactor999]

Re: Moon Landings Faked?

I happen to be giving top dollar for all souls at this time!!!!

 

[Mooned]

Re: Moon Landings Faked?

Reading through this thread, I see that a member went to the trouble of listing a "Partial Summary of Apollo Hoax Evidence". I think it particularly telling that all the defenders of the Apollo fraud have nothing to say. There are just the irrelevant comments like "I sprayed coffee out of my mouth". So pussycat got your collective tongues? I've never heard of anyone successfully defend against the undisturbed dust under the LEM (where one might reasonably expect a good sized rocket thrust crater). Let's begin with that one.

It's also amusing that NASA cannot "find" blueprints for either the LEM or the Rover. You would think that out of the hundreds, if not thousands, of private companies that would have a hand in building the LEM/Rover... that there would be many surviving copies. Yet no LEM or Rover blueprints are anywhere to be found. Of course, if the LEM/Rover are actually theatrical stage props... I understand. However, if those particular blueprints ever show, I want ten copies for my mother. :lol:

If you can believe NASA fudged the Apollo program, you can also believe the fudging did not begin with Apollo. Recently, I have begun to see speculation regarding the Mercury, Gemini as well as the early Apollo programs. For example, there is a Swiss fellow who claims most of those missions flew empty (as did the moon rockets). All this is new (and news) to me. For example, I knew the Apollo 11 crew never left low-Earth-orbit. It never occurred to me they possibly never left Earth. Here is that Swiss guy's website:

http://www.geschichteinchronologie.ch/a ... -ENGL.html

If anyone knows of similar sites, please pass them along. Thank you.

 

[andromeda2010]

Re: Moon Landings Faked?

I'm so tired of people saying that the moon landing is faked. I like the recommendation of SpeedFreek for those people who believe it's faked: http://www.clavius.org/

 

[origin]

Re: Moon Landings Faked?

It never occurred to me they possibly never left Earth. Here is that Swiss guy's website:

http://www.geschichteinchronologie.ch/a ... -ENGL.html

If anyone knows of similar sites, please pass them along. Thank you.

Here are some.

http;//www.mybrainisthesizeofawalnut.com
http;//www.iaintgotaclue.com
http;//www.illbelieveanythingaslongasitisridiculus.ch
http;//www.myhpothesis.com/arestupid/andclearlywrongeventoacasualobserver.html

 

[MeteorWayne]

Re: Moon Landings Faked?

Reading through this thread, I see that a member went to the trouble of listing a "Partial Summary of Apollo Hoax Evidence". I think it particularly telling that all the defenders of the Apollo fraud have nothing to say.

Apparently you didn't read the first 17 pages of this discussion.

 

[BurgerB75]

Re: Moon Landings Faked?

Quackery

Another drive-by poster. Just go bury your head in the sand and continue believing what you want.

 

[dryson]

Re: Moon Landings Faked?

People who think that the Moon landings were faked are stuck so far in the past they will never catch up to theirself because they are afraid of the reality of growing old.

 

[andrew_t1000]

Re: Moon Landings Faked?

I'm starting to think if we rounded up the hoax believers, took them to the moon, showed them the landing sites and all the hardware, they still would still think it was a put on.

 

[drwayne]

Re: Moon Landings Faked?

I'm starting to think if we rounded up the hoax believers, took them to the moon, showed them the landing sites and all the hardware, they still would still think it was a put on.

I have mumbled on several occasions that if one is totally committed to believing something, that they
can explain away any evidence. In a case like this the person can simply say something like:

"How do I know I am *really* on the moon? I bet its just a soundstage on Earth, see, if I open this faceplate - arghh"

and then a fellow hoax believer would ask

"How did y'all build this big a vacuum sound stage?"

or of they accept they are on the moon they can simply state that the hardware was snuck up there
at a later time, when they capability to get to the moon wasn't a fake.

 

[Mee_n_Mac]

Re: Moon Landings Faked?

In a case like this the person can simply say something like:

"How do I know I am *really* on the moon? I bet its just a soundstage on Earth, see, if I open this faceplate - arghh"

and then a fellow hoax believer would ask

"How did y'all build this big a vacuum sound stage?"

ROFLOL !!

 

[andromeda2010]

Re: Moon Landings Faked?

If space will be commonplace in the coming years or decades. and people go to the moon to see the landing site of apollo and proved that man really landed on the moon on July 20, 1969 i wonder if conspiracy theorists will accept that fact and admit that they are wrong IF they are still alive when that time happens.


Oh i wonder if we send a manned mission to Mars in 2030's just like Obama said. Will conspiracy theorists say that the Mars landing was also faked!? I hope not 'cause we have the technology to land a man on the planet Mars.

 

[drwayne]

Re: Moon Landings Faked?

I have come to accept the following:

"If it can be believed, someone will believe it."

and, given the internet - they will tell you about it.

 

[MeteorWayne]

Re: Moon Landings Faked?

If space will be commonplace in the coming years or decades. and people go to the moon to see the landing site of apollo and proved that man really landed on the moon on July 20, 1969 i wonder if conspiracy theorists will accept that fact and admit that they are wrong IF they are still alive when that time happens.

No....

 

[andromeda2010]

Re: Moon Landings Faked?

If space will be commonplace in the coming years or decades. and people go to the moon to see the landing site of apollo and proved that man really landed on the moon on July 20, 1969 i wonder if conspiracy theorists will accept that fact and admit that they are wrong IF they are still alive when that time happens.

No....

Yeah, nothing will convinced them. I just hope they will find the truth.

 

[Kerberos]

Re: Moon Landings Faked?

...

It's a waste of time to try discussing the evidence of a hoax on this board, Mooned, because the Moon-landing true-believers crush any dissent and ignore all the evidence. Just look back at all the reasonable questions and evidence raised here and how the true-believers ridicule it or cover it up, but never answer it. MeteorWayne is the chief NASA enforcer here.

 

[MeteorWayne]

Re: Moon Landings Faked?

Careful Kerberos.... Don't make accusations you can't back up, even in jest. :!:

 

[Kerberos]

Re: Moon Landings Faked?

You can't cover up for NASA forever, MW. Sooner or later, the truth will set us free.

 

[BurgerB75]

Re: Moon Landings Faked?

The truth hasn't set you free though... :lol:

 

[vladdrac]

Re: Moon Landings Faked?

Rushes staff will be offering you a writers position in no time :lol:

...

It's a waste of time to try discussing the evidence of a hoax on this board, Mooned, because the Moon-landing true-believers crush any dissent and ignore all the evidence. Just look back at all the reasonable questions and evidence raised here and how the true-believers ridicule it or cover it up, but never answer it. MeteorWayne is the chief NASA enforcer here.

 

[JamesSimon]

Re: Moon Landings Faked?

the 1969 version of this, i believe is not true. well, thats just me.

there's no point in discussing things like this, but we as people always try to fight, so i think this also normal. its like discussing religion gods and the all-time fave, "chicken and egg" debate. lol.

 

[a_lost_packet_]

Re: Moon Landings Faked?

Welcome to SDC!

the 1969 version of this, i believe is not true. well, thats just me.

And, why would you believe such a thing when there is entirely too much evidence to the contrary?

there's no point in discussing things like this, but we as people always try to fight, so i think this also normal. its like discussing religion gods and the all-time fave, "chicken and egg" debate. lol.

Uh, no... There is a point in discussing such things like this if both people hold to the same standards regarding "evidence."

But, if you simply want to believe that we didn't land on the Moon well, that's your "belief." Just don't try to present it as fact because it will be easily established that it is not.

 

[Mooned]

Re: Moon Landings Faked?

the 1969 version of this, i believe is not true. well, thats just me.

there's no point in discussing things like this, but we as people always try to fight, so i think this also normal. its like discussing religion gods and the all-time fave, "chicken and egg" debate. lol.

Religion and chicken/egg debates may very well have no answer. However, you will be richly rewarded by digging a little deeper on the '69 moon landings. Too, you will notice a pattern emerge from those who argue against such conspiracies... that is, they tend to argue with evidence that you are expected to trust them for. For example, I just recently saw a major web site attack the Jack White photo analysis of the Mary Moorman snapshot (JFK assassination). Jack White laid out a very detailed analysis of the photograph which puts Mary Moorman standing squarely in the street (and not on the grass as depicted in the Zapruder film). The site owner counters simply by stating "I did a detailed analysis of the Moorman photo and my analysis puts her on the grass". That it. No pictures, no graphs, no methods... just, "trust me, I did an analysis".

In the case of Apollo, the amount of evidence against is endless. The best collection of evidence is located at AULIS.com It took me 3 days to skim over their evidence... and that's only a fraction of what's out there. For this reason, I have come to the conviction that those who know the subject well enough to be familiar with such evidence cannot support the moon landings in good faith i.e. they are full knowing liars. :shock: