<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'><font color="#ff0000">The best images of Pluto will have better resolution than the image on the right (of Jupiter's moon, Ganymede), the best images of Charion will be almost as good. Looks pretty good to me. The frame at left was taken by the Voyager 2 spacecraft when it flew by in 1979, with a resolution of about 1.3 kilometers (0.8 mile) per pixel. The frame at right showing the same area was captured by Galileo during its first flyby of Ganymede on June 27, 1996; it has a resolution of about 74 meters (243 feet) per pixel, more than 17 times better than that of the Voyager image. <font color="#000080">
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/solar/ganymede.html <br /></font>Posted by centsworth_II</font></DIV></p><p><strong><font size="2">Thank you very much Centsworth_II. </font></strong></p><p><strong><font size="2">A great illustration of what I was trying to explain & you picked a great observation from a great mission. I still remember the first Galileo encounter of Ganymede & the frustratingly long wait for the first images (this was just before the final data compression software was uplinked to Galileo & the return of data from the second Ganymede & first Callisto encounters, etc were very much quicker). </font></strong></p><p><strong><font size="2">Yes the NH imagery of both Pluto & Charon & by sheer lucky chance of Nix will be stunning, when considering the lighting conditions verses speed of NH. Even NH images of Hydra will still be sharper than the left hand panel of Ganymede in your post.<br /></font></strong></p><p>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'><font color="#ff0000">man im really hyped up about this and DAWN. I love these deep space mission more than anything. Its a shame we cant get a good view of Sedna or Eris. Its also a shame NH is just a flyby not an orbiter, so IMO, dont expect much detail from the images. Kind of like the Voyager flybys. Quick overval view and small sections close up. Im expecting New Horizons to bring a few answers once it finishes its primary mission. Investigating the Pioneer Anomaly. KBO object exploration, possibility of larger bodies beyond Pluto. More specifically how common are theyWhat do Pluto and Triton have in common, could there be Methane plumes on Pluto?Finally getting images from deep space. Finally images from beyond Neptune. This is the most important thing. Pointing the Lorri towards the unknown. i would add a thing about planet x. But short of going back in time and revising textbooks, i dont think you can ever stop that stupid conspiracy theory. Yet if something was out there in that Axis, NH would find it. This will be like the 1970's pioneer missions. All kinds of discoveries are going to come from mission. I promise. Everything past this point is unknown. <br />Posted by stupidlaminatedrock</font></DIV></p><p><strong><font size="2" color="#000000">Hi stupidlaminatedrock,</font></strong></p><p><strong><font size="2" color="#000000">Yes me too. I was involved in the campaigns to save both DAWN & New Horizons as well as the Phoenix Mars Lander from cancellation, so in a way, these are like my children.</font></strong></p><p><strong><font size="2" color="#000000">Phoenix Mars Lander is already returning fantastic data from Scandia Colles in the arctic region of Mars, New Horizons has already excelled at Jupiter (I was successful in getting NH to make extra obs of Io, I was not alone in this, but was instrumental), not to mention stunning obs of Jovian weather & fresh obs of Europa, Ganymede & Callisto too, as well as getting light curves & spectra of the middle group smaller moons (suspected captured type S asteroids) Elara & Himalia, already some long range obs of Pluto & next August or September, NH will be able to split Pluto & Charon with the LORRI.</font></strong></p><p><strong><font size="2" color="#000000">It's difficult to say if Pluto will have Methane plumes. Whilst Triton & Pluto are very similar (Triton being a little larger, denser & therefore more massive of the two), Triton literally melted from the inside out, during capture by Neptune. Triton's initial orbit around Neptune would have been very elliptical, thus the tidal flexing would have been tremendous as Triton's forward momentum was robbed, possible only second to Jupiter's Io in this respect.</font></strong></p><p><strong><font size="2" color="#000000">As Triton's orbit became more circular the internal frictional heating waned & Triton refroze, with a brand new surface. Voyager 2 imagery suggests this may have been as recent as 500 million years ago, (only about one ninth of the age of the solar system), though that figure is a little arbitary as the cratering rate within the Neptune system is not accurately known.</font></strong></p><p><strong><font size="2" color="#000000">AFAIK, Pluto on the other hand has not been 'roughed up' or modified by tidal heating, so I expect Pluto to be a more primitive looking Triton, possibly crater scarred with less or even no evidence of cryovolcanism. But then we just do not know!!!! Perhaps Pluto will turn out to be like another Triton, but I doubt it. </font></strong></p><p><strong><font size="2" color="#000000">There appears to be circumstantial evidence of cryovolcanism on Charon (crystalline ice & possible methane outgassing)??????</font></strong></p><p><strong><font size="2" color="#000000">New Horizons will search for other smaller moons orbiting Pluto & should find any that are there (if any more exist, but would not surprise me if there are more) & even looking for rings (I doubt Pluto has rings, Pluto's relatively low gravity & proximity of a large moon, IMO would disrupt any rings).</font></strong></p><p><strong><font size="2" color="#000000">The KBOs Ixion & Quaoar will be approx 15 AU away from NH at this time & perhaps post Pluto encounter, the LORRI could be used to obtain light curves of both (too far away though to resolve them other than points against the stars).</font></strong></p><p><strong><font size="2" color="#000000">Eris, Sedna, Makemake, Varuna, Orcus & 2003 EL61 (Santa), etc unfortunately are far too far away to be observed, but as H20universe (Joel) says, there will be an active KBO search for further close encounters (I suspect there will be further encounters. Objects in this part of the Solar System are turning up frequently now, so I'm confident, the mission will not end at Pluto).</font></strong></p><p><strong><font size="2" color="#000000">Andrew Brown.</font></strong></p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font color="#000080">"I suddenly noticed an anomaly to the left of Io, just off the rim of that world. It was extremely large with respect to the overall size of Io and crescent shaped. It seemed unbelievable that something that big had not been visible before".</font> <em><strong><font color="#000000">Linda Morabito </font></strong><font color="#800000">on discovering that the Jupiter moon Io was volcanically active. Friday 9th March 1979.</font></em></p><p>
<font size="1" color="#000080">http://www.launchphotography.com/</font><br /><br />
<font size="1" color="#000080">http://anthmartian.googlepages.com/thisislandearth</font></p><p>
<font size="1" color="#000080">http://web.me.com/meridianijournal</font></p> </div>