<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'><font color="#ff0000">really? what should be humidity in the atmosphere to form such frost? if it's really frost, then how it could affect instruments in longterm? cameras, for example.Posted by cello</font>[/Quote]</p><p><strong><font size="2">Good point cello. To me that was what it looked like, what looked like a fairly uniform light coating, so probably jumping the gun a bit there. It was suggested that the maximum temperature is minus 33 Celsius in the Sun (approx 7 C warmer than expected). </font></strong></p><p><strong><font size="2">It will be very interesting when the actual readings are through. The Sun is currently circumplolar from the Phoenix site, dipping to about 2 degrees above the northern horizon @ midnight, so I wonder what the temperature is at that point?</font></strong></p><p><strong><font size="2"><br /></font></strong>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'><font color="#ff0000">You sure that's frost on the foot pad? Might it just be reflected sunlight off the dust?Posted by derekmcd</font></DIV> </p><p><strong><font size="2">Hi Derek, I was not 100% sure, but to me @ the time, it looked the most likely explanation for what appeared to be a fairly uniform light coating on the footpad & support leg. Of course a light toned dust will have exactly the same effect.</font></strong></p><p>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'><font color="#ff0000">Not me. A rover probably wouldd not reach those hills in time. A rover would not be ideal to do the work that Phoenix is designed to do. Jon <br />Posted by jonclarke</font></DIV></p><p><font size="2"><strong>I'm with you on this Jon. </strong></font></p><p><font size="2"><strong>I cannot believe that some people are already moaning (sol 2). Phoenix IS a superb craft, well built, superbly engineered & with an incredible mission team @ NASA controlling the mission. A lot of people campaigned against the cancellation of this mission (yours truly here included) were as you can see, successful with the petitioning, to give the Mars Surveyor 2001 spacecraft a new mission rather than languish in a museum, going nowhere, doing nothing & contributing nothing to the long term investment of human knowledge.</strong></font></p><p><font size="2"><strong>I for one am absolutely delighted, over the Moon, or over Mars in this case, with Phoenix & how the mission is going. </strong></font></p><p><font size="2"><strong>We are going to learn SO much about the northern high latitudes of Mars in general & of the landing site in particular, the cycles of long term Martian meterology, was this area an ancient sea bed, was there ever life here, did the rotational axis of Mars vary much more than now (some scientists reckon so).</strong></font></p><p><font size="2"><strong>Was the atmosphere much denser, did it ever rain here during Mars's youth, not to mention we will have detailed surface views of another location (no 6) on the Red Planet & the highest latitude to date (at approx 68 degrees 12' N), far more northerly then the previous record holder, Viking 2 (at approx 48 deg N). Was this part of Scandia Colles an ancient sea bed?<br /></strong></font><font size="2"><strong> </strong></font></p><p><font size="2"><strong>There is also a good chance (though not guaranteed) that Phoenix will last well past 90 sols & we'll see the onset of Autumn (if Phoenix is still operating in January 2009), though off course we will not have the longevity of the Viking Landers (RTG powered) or the MERs (in the tropics), due to the location & the Winter Sun fails to rise here at all (not much good for a solar powered craft needless to say).</strong></font></p><p><font size="2"><strong>It is a great shame that some people are moaning. </strong></font></p><p><font size="2"><strong>Andrew Brown.</strong></font></p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font color="#000080">"I suddenly noticed an anomaly to the left of Io, just off the rim of that world. It was extremely large with respect to the overall size of Io and crescent shaped. It seemed unbelievable that something that big had not been visible before".</font> <em><strong><font color="#000000">Linda Morabito </font></strong><font color="#800000">on discovering that the Jupiter moon Io was volcanically active. Friday 9th March 1979.</font></em></p><p>
<font size="1" color="#000080">http://www.launchphotography.com/</font><br /><br />
<font size="1" color="#000080">http://anthmartian.googlepages.com/thisislandearth</font></p><p>
<font size="1" color="#000080">http://web.me.com/meridianijournal</font></p> </div>