<blockquote><font class="small">In reply to:</font><hr /><p>The Sun light is the source of energy. The wind is the way that polin is being spread. The CO2 is avilable, as well as water, so the photo synthesis is possible. <p><hr /></p></p></blockquote><br /><br />Those plants don't look like they use photosynthesis, and what water would they use? How efficient would it be to spread pollen during Martian sandstorms? Wouldn't it be really easy for all pollen to die in its freezing cold tundra-like, high-radiation , no-water, acidic environment? Why would flowers evolve twice, on two worlds? Flowers aren't the most efficient form of life on such a planet.<br /><br /><br /><blockquote><font class="small">In reply to:</font><hr /><p>And, there is a lot of images of small worms, and of snakes, and of statues, that is being rejected by official pseudoscience.<p><hr /></p></p></blockquote><br /><br />The statues have been refuted. Snakes have no evolutionary background on Mars. I can understand different kinds of "worms" popping up on alien worlds, but I can assure you that no photograph from Mars shows this form of life. What are you going to say next? You see genetically-engineered coffee beans growing on Mars? Snakes and flowers are arbitrary life-forms. <br /><br /><blockquote><font class="small">In reply to:</font><hr /><p>Which tells me, that "scientists" can not be trusted. One has to use his own mind.<p><hr /></p></p></blockquote><br /><br />No, you assume what you just said to be fact. Your reasoning logic is flawed.