1
1of6Billion
Guest
I'm not sure how to formulate this, but I'll give it a try.
(also, if this is the n-th time this question is asked, forgive me)
The Big Bang is currently the best accepted theory on how the universe started. Right?
Following on the Big Bang there is an ongoing period of expansion. Right?
So, if we look at a photo Hubble made of a galaxy some 13,8 billion light years away, we look at a much smaller universe than our current. Right?
If we point Hubble in the opposite direction of the first snapshot, what doe we see? :?: :?: :?:
Is it the same galaxy? Is the sky littered with repeating patches of ancient universe? :ugeek:
Or is the ancient universe somehow stretched all over the sky? If so, how's that possible?? :shock:
(also, if this is the n-th time this question is asked, forgive me)
The Big Bang is currently the best accepted theory on how the universe started. Right?
Following on the Big Bang there is an ongoing period of expansion. Right?
So, if we look at a photo Hubble made of a galaxy some 13,8 billion light years away, we look at a much smaller universe than our current. Right?
If we point Hubble in the opposite direction of the first snapshot, what doe we see? :?: :?: :?:
Is it the same galaxy? Is the sky littered with repeating patches of ancient universe? :ugeek:
Or is the ancient universe somehow stretched all over the sky? If so, how's that possible?? :shock: