From a drop of water....

[Atlan0001]

The simplest and least understood thing about the infinities of universes is that eternally they are spontaneously recreating themselves new every instant of time. If there is magic to the cosmopolis, that is it . . . and it is not relative but quantum.

 

[Atlan0001]

#876 continued:

How can a universe continuously be new (continuously be renewing) yet have past-future histories (SPACETIME)?! When it is two paralleling universes, one that is SPACETIME relative, observed and observable, and the other that isn't!

 

[Atlan0001]

I woke up in the middle of the night to the realization, to the physical fact, that no force overrides the sheer existence of the microcosmic, at once macrocosmic, fundamentality of "set and reset," a strong suit of the 'strong interaction'!!!!

The 'strong suit' too many professional physicists try to limit to the microcosm alone while trying constantly to project "heat death" (death in "deep freeze") on the overall cosmopolis! I, on the other hand, along with some few others, have the microcosm at small, beyond local relativity, modeling the macrocosm at large, beyond local relativity . . . and vice-versa!

Then there is the always discounted, by many, "Life Force" and "Life Zone" (Stephen Hawking envisioned plurality of "zones") of the universes....
--------------------------

"Communication across the revolutionary divide is inevitably partial." -- Thomas S. Kuhn

 

[Harry Costas]

There is a theory that a Singularity forms and nothing can escape its hold on all matter and EMR.

All Condensates have a property.
Chiral Super-Symmetry Dipolar Electro-magnetic, forming Vector Vortices and a CORE that attracts matter and all.

So! Singularity can never form.

 

[Atlan0001]

There is a theory that a Singularity forms and nothing can escape its hold on all matter and EMR.

All Condensates have a property.
Chiral Super-Symmetry Dipolar Electro-magnetic, forming Vector Vortices and a CORE that attracts matter and all.

So! Singularity can never form.

Infinity in all its forms doesn't "form" (in all its infinities of pointedly singular forms . . . never 'forms')!

 

[Atlan0001]

Post #869 to be continued:

Page 35 - From a drop of water....

Page 35 - Seeking answers about space? Join the Space community: the premier source of space exploration, innovation, and astronomy news, chronicling (and celebrating) humanity's ongoing expansion across the final frontier.

forums.space.com

So even the 1-dimensional thinker is [in on] one dimension of an always crossing equal but opposed concurrent multi-dimensional entity:

Thinking about my picturing, my modeling, of "the closed up superposition collapsed cosmological constant (/\) Planck (BC) (BB) 'Mirror Event Horizon' of an infinity of horizon universes (the Infinite MULTIVERSE Universe (U))" . . . always in time reversal to the horizon constancy of the Plank units, particularly in this case, the collapsed cosmological constant (/\) unit -- and universality -- of the "Planck heat" (death BY heat)!

I repeat: So even the 1-dimensional thinker is [in on] one dimension of an always crossing equal but opposed concurrent multi-dimensional entity.
------------------------------

"Communication across the revolutionary divide is inevitably partial." -- Thomas S. Kuhn.

 

[Atlan0001]

I decided I have to point this repetition out here in continuing rather than copying the whole over...!

The FTL Accelerating Expansion of the Universe is Always Backward in Time!

The universe is expanding faster than the speed of light because the flow direction of the expansion is always backward in time! IT IS THAT SIMPLE! The universe's flow direction of time travel, NOT THAT OF ANYTHING AND EVERYTHING IN IT! is backward in time! The unobservable future histories...

forums.space.com

 

[Atlan0001]

Imagine if there is much, much more universe out there in the folds -- in the depths -- of universe not observed from any distant point of universe in the redshifts of light (if the redshifts show only superficial surface wave crests):

Cantor set - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Atlan0001]

"Repetition":

Analogues:

SPACE equals:

Stephen Hawking's meta-physical cosmological "opinion!" : "Grand Central Station of the Universe (U)" overhung with a centrally located special clock having an eternal singularity of clock time (t=0) underneath which all things and all life passes while never surpassing the apex summit (t=0).

Equals:

Atlan0001's analogue (and meta-physical cosmological "opinion" (and picture modeling)!) : "Timelessly 'Infinite MULTIVERSE Universe (U)'."

Fronted by:

Atlan0001's meta-physical cosmological "opinion" (and picture modeling)!: Entangled, entangling, spontaneously concurrent (t=0) REALTIME NOW (t=0) trunk-instant moment of new universe (u) creation (horizon universes (u) (universe (u) horizons) always RECREATIVE (always in RECREATION)). Always the 'door' and/or 'window' opening before (future histories t=-1) . . . and closing behind (past histories t=+1).

 

[Atlan0001]

I came across a video entitled "The End of the Universe." It started out with, "The universe was small and dense...."

Really laughable as far as I'm concerned, because I have it in my picture modeling that that particular "zone" of cosmopolis is always really small and dense, including deep within each and every particle making up each and every one of us, at the far, far plane deep of the collapsed cosmological constant (/\) -- universal -- Planck (BC) (BB) Horizon!

Precisely the same collapsed cosmological constant (/\) -- universal -- Planck (BC) (BB)Horizon . . . always! Seemingly in two places at once but actually a singularity in just one place quantum entangling across space and time and dimensions with itself:

Klein bottle - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Atlan0001]

A response there, I feel it a strengthening link in the chain here:

Question - Not when or where or how but why did the Big Bang happen.

Please forgive me if this question has been asked before and will fully understand if this thread has to be deleted. Its a question ive asked myself for many years, was there a reason for the big bang and if so who or what was responsible. I,m no expert as in from an academic view point was...

forums.space.com

 

[Atlan0001]

In all my more than seventy years interest in and study of history, I've realized that it isn't as certain as the record of it. Even the best histories I've read (such as Will Durant's, Edward Gibbon's, etc.,) are novel stories. So are SPACETIME's recorded coordinate points past-future histories ((t=+1) (t=-1)) in fact after the instantaneous moment of REALTIME NOW (t=0) creation, become Heisenberg uncertainties and Schrodinger cats.

 

[Atlan0001]

Occasionally over my long life of wide reading and study I've come upon the descriptive entities of "infinite zero", "infinitesimal zero", and "infinity of zero." A working part of two careers has been in computers and communications, having working association with binary base2, '0' and/or '1', which I've also seen streaming in movies as if they (as physical information) were replacing quantum particles in the scheme of things. I'm long used to '0' meaning something besides nothing . . . and that something real, as far as I'm concerned, is that it, '0', numbers 'infinity' (infinity, infinite, infinitesimal....) in the round ( ∞ ).

So, too, when I mention an infinite density anywhere in my posts, at the same time I am mentioning an infinite hole, void, vacuum....

I know several of you have heard or read the term "coming from out of nowhere," or "something from out of nothing at all." Infinite '0'. Infinitesimal '0'. Infinity of '0'. A density of the Cosmic All always existing greater (therefore hotter), and at once lesser (therefore colder), than we can ever even conceive of! An 'Infinite MULTIVERSE Universe'!

 

[Atlan0001]

Ad #888:

The grand total mass and energy equals zero . . . as Stephen Hawking wrote that it should. Not tomorrow, now!

It takes the negative (-) to get the positive (+) to a neutrality (infinite '0'). And from out of neutrality (infinite '0')....