C
CalliArcale
Guest
<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>Are there detectors of enough sensitivity to get enough data to give us a facsimile of "sound" from Mars? A warbling tone might not be something worthy of a Grammy. But, the air is pretty thin up there. I don't know that we'd get much unless it was gusting fairly fierce. <br /> Posted by a_lost_packet_</DIV></p><p>There were microphones on Mars Polar Lander, I remember, but of course they didn't get the chance to hear anything (except perhaps "thud"). I wonder what they would've heard. </p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p> </p><p><font color="#666699"><em>"People assume that time is a strict progression of cause to effect, but actually from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint it's more like a big ball of wibbly wobbly . . . timey wimey . . . stuff."</em> -- The Tenth Doctor, "Blink"</font></p> </div>