<blockquote><font class="small">In reply to:</font><hr /><p>No pint in post mortem.The maen are alive,more than enogh proof it was ok. <p><hr /></p></p></blockquote><br /><br />Well, you know the old aviator expression: any landing you can walk away from is a good landing. If you can use the plane again, it's a great landing. This was therefore a great landing. <img src="/images/icons/tongue.gif" /><br /><br />That said, there most certainly was a post mortem. There is after every flight. In this case, there was some damage to the vehicle as SG described. Every aircraft should be inspected after every flight, from a Cessna to an SR-71, and the Orbiter is certainly no exception. <br /><br />EDIT: Additional curiosities from STS-3: it was the first flight with an unpainted ET, and the only flight ever to land at White Sands -- the latter fact meriting extra attention during postflight inspections. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p> </p><p><font color="#666699"><em>"People assume that time is a strict progression of cause to effect, but actually from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint it's more like a big ball of wibbly wobbly . . . timey wimey . . . stuff."</em> -- The Tenth Doctor, "Blink"</font></p> </div>