R
Shadowslayer81":225nikpg said:Oh they went to the moon alright. But the lighting was off so they filmed the whole thing in my dads backyard in arizona. Said if he ever said anything about it they'd shoot'em. But you know Bureaucracy is bad so the paper work for shooting him got lost along with the original tapes so were still here ;-)
Seriously i've been reading this site for years and I didn't think you guys would entertain suchs post after all you give them evidence and they'll say robots did it or some crap. Nasa needs to send a mission to land an hd camera a few hundred feet from a landing site and broadcast back video with a caption saying "Yeah we were totally there"
ZenGalacticore":1e5ny6vt said:You'd think that pictures of the distant Earth taken from the Moon would be evidence enough. No science fiction production at that time had such an image, and CGI of that level was not available, even to the US government, that I know of, anyway. The outer space special-effects of "2001: A Space Odyssey" do not even come close. And that was made in, lo and behold, 1968!
davcbow":256lu7bj said:Some people wouldnt believe we landed on the moon unless you took them to the moon and proved it to them in person.....
silylene":2cshgzcb said:And Apollo 14, from the same link as above:
Smersh":2zggk1jj said:silylene":2zggk1jj said:And Apollo 14, from the same link as above:
Conspiracy theorists on other boards are already asking why the black mark shown as "LM shadow" in the above photo, and also in other photos here appear to be going in the opposite direction to the shadows in the craters.
I'd quite like to answer that point, but I don't know the reason, (unless they are not going in a different direction because the shadows in the craters are coming from the walls on the left, with sunlight on the right of the crater floors.) Any ideas, anyone?
Kerberos":1ub8rkcj said:Pffft. <dismissive wave of hand>
Do you think we don't realize that those photos are obviously faked? I think we can safely agree that if NASA could fake the moon landings in 1969, then faking a few photos in 2009 is easy. I can't believe how naive some of you are.
I'd quite like to answer that point, but I don't know the reason, (unless they are not going in a different direction because the shadows in the craters are coming from the walls on the left, with sunlight on the right of the crater floors.) Any ideas, anyone?
krash":3dnsgr4j said:Kerberos":3dnsgr4j said:Pffft. <dismissive wave of hand>
Do you think we don't realize that those photos are obviously faked? I think we can safely agree that if NASA could fake the moon landings in 1969, then faking a few photos in 2009 is easy. I can't believe how naive some of you are.
You're kidding, right?
The government can't keep a blow job in the white house a secret. How could they ever possibily keep "faked moon landings" a secret?
If the moon landings were really faked, it would be out. Period. It wouldn't be in the same category as Bigfoot.
Smersh":1k3d61ks said:silylene":1k3d61ks said:And Apollo 14, from the same link as above:
Conspiracy theorists on other boards are already asking why the black mark shown as "LM shadow" in the above photo, and also in other photos here appear to be going in the opposite direction to the shadows in the craters.
I'd quite like to answer that point, but I don't know the reason, (unless they are not going in a different direction because the shadows in the craters are coming from the walls on the left, with sunlight on the right of the crater floors.) Any ideas, anyone?
Don't tell me you're falling for this moon landing fiction.krash":26b4r887 said:Kerberos":26b4r887 said:Pffft. <dismissive wave of hand>
Do you think we don't realize that those photos are obviously faked? I think we can safely agree that if NASA could fake the moon landings in 1969, then faking a few photos in 2009 is easy. I can't believe how naive some of you are.
You're kidding, right?
The government can't keep a blow job in the white house a secret. How could they ever possibily keep "faked moon landings" a secret?
If the moon landings were really faked, it would be out. Period. It wouldn't be in the same category as Bigfoot.
Kerberos":2qbjfn3q said:Don't tell me you're falling for this moon landing fiction.krash":2qbjfn3q said:Kerberos":2qbjfn3q said:Pffft. <dismissive wave of hand>
Do you think we don't realize that those photos are obviously faked? I think we can safely agree that if NASA could fake the moon landings in 1969, then faking a few photos in 2009 is easy. I can't believe how naive some of you are.
You're kidding, right?
The government can't keep a blow job in the white house a secret. How could they ever possibily keep "faked moon landings" a secret?
If the moon landings were really faked, it would be out. Period. It wouldn't be in the same category as Bigfoot.
Listen to me, it's bigger than just some spaceman hoax; it's a HUGE conspiracy with tentacles everywhere. You don't even realize how bad it is. It goes back to the fourties when the Government decided to fake the Moon itself.