STS-120/10A Mission thread (post launch)

[SpaceKiwi]

Can anyone advise if the Mission Status Briefing has been held for today yet? I've just got to work and hope not to have missed it.<br /><br />Thanks. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><em><font size="2" color="#ff0000">Who is this superhero?  Henry, the mild-mannered janitor ... could be!</font></em></p><p><em><font size="2">-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</font></em></p><p><font size="5">Bring Back The Black!</font></p> </div>

 

[MeteorWayne]

There has been no announcement of a MSB on NASA TV, and I've been watching for at least 6 hours now. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font color="#000080"><em><font color="#000000">But the Krell forgot one thing John. Monsters. Monsters from the Id.</font></em> </font></p><p><font color="#000080">I really, really, really, really miss the "first unread post" function</font><font color="#000080"> </font></p> </div>

 

[SpaceKiwi]

Thanks MW, I'll fire up Media Player then and see what's what. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><em><font size="2" color="#ff0000">Who is this superhero?  Henry, the mild-mannered janitor ... could be!</font></em></p><p><em><font size="2">-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</font></em></p><p><font size="5">Bring Back The Black!</font></p> </div>

 

[thereiwas]

MSB at 2:30 EDT, just announced. That matches the published schedule.<br />

 

[MeteorWayne]

ROFL, coming up in 5 minutes...... <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font color="#000080"><em><font color="#000000">But the Krell forgot one thing John. Monsters. Monsters from the Id.</font></em> </font></p><p><font color="#000080">I really, really, really, really miss the "first unread post" function</font><font color="#000080"> </font></p> </div>

 

[SpaceKiwi]

MSB to start momentarily.<br /><br /> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><em><font size="2" color="#ff0000">Who is this superhero?  Henry, the mild-mannered janitor ... could be!</font></em></p><p><em><font size="2">-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</font></em></p><p><font size="5">Bring Back The Black!</font></p> </div>

 

[thereiwas]

From the photo it looks to me like those fraying cables are at fault again. I think I can see some entanglement between the edge cable and the first cable in from that, at least at the point of the tear.<br /><br />Nuclear power looks better and better for space stations, if you really need that many Watts. And much more efficient utilization.

 

[MeteorWayne]

Wow, the return is along that edge, but is not damaged since the array is putting out 97 % of capacity.<br /><br />Pam made a great choice aborting when she did. Had they gone another 6 inches it could have wiped out half of the array!! <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font color="#000080"><em><font color="#000000">But the Krell forgot one thing John. Monsters. Monsters from the Id.</font></em> </font></p><p><font color="#000080">I really, really, really, really miss the "first unread post" function</font><font color="#000080"> </font></p> </div>

 

[Testing]

Who invited Murphy on this mission?<br /> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>

 

[mi2again]

"Nuclear power looks better and better for space stations, if you really need that many Watts. And much more efficient utilization"<br /><br />Based on what? A couple of minor glitches. Solar power is easy and cheap. Nuke power is not needed in LEO. Way more problems with nukes. Radiator area would cause similar issues as solar arrays

 

[thereiwas]

I sort of agree nuke power is not needed in LEO today - efficient power use is better, like LED lighting like Bigelow is using. But what about a big orbital hotel? Remember the space station in "2001"? No panels on that. Anything spinning fast enough to create useful gravity is not going to be solar powered.

 

[baktothemoon]

>Based on what? A couple of minor glitches. Solar power is easy and cheap. Nuke power is not needed in LEO. Way more problems with nukes. Radiator area would cause similar issues as solar arrays <br /><br />Still, nuclear power is worth exploring for future station and space craft, solar power may be cheap, but at least it would provide more consistent power, and if we ever build a large station we wouldn't need 15 launches to put up a football field size solar array, we would only need one or two to send up a reactor.

 

[bobblebob]

Just come home and seen the damage. Feel so so gutted and sad <img src="/images/icons/frown.gif" />

 

[bobblebob]

"Italian astronaut Paolo Nespoli, assisting Parazynski and Wheelock as they doffed their suits and stowed tools, reported the crew was missing a digital camera and flash.<br /><br />"It's probably outside on the tool box on the airlock," he reported<br /><br />I hope it is!<br />

 

[MeteorWayne]

If not, get out a baseball glove and a pair of binoculars <img src="/images/icons/smile.gif" /> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font color="#000080"><em><font color="#000000">But the Krell forgot one thing John. Monsters. Monsters from the Id.</font></em> </font></p><p><font color="#000080">I really, really, really, really miss the "first unread post" function</font><font color="#000080"> </font></p> </div>

 

[halman]

Just read that one of the cosmonauts has reported noticing a hole in one of his gloves. This issue is probably going to require some changes, as torn gloves have occurred on several space walks now. Micrometeorite pitting can create very small, sharp points on metallic surfaces, it would seem, as there has been no handling of sharp materials.<br /><br />When I used to climb towers, I used two pair of gloves, one heavy, one light. The heavy ones were for climbing, and the light ones were for doing the actual work. (Sometimes I had to use bare hands, but I tried to avoid that.) Of course, changing gloves on a spacewalk is impossible, but using a heavier glove results in hand fatigue very quickly.<br /><br />Perhaps a pair of heavy mittens could be worn over the spacesuit gloves for traversing, and removed for fine work. They would have to be attached to the suit somehow to prevent them from drifting away when not in use, and stowed in a pouch to keep them from interfering with work, but such a solution would minimize torn gloves from moving around the station. This also might help to mitigate the problems that have been experienced with fingers getting cold after a few hours on a spacewalk, which has been reported occasionally. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> The secret to peace of mind is a short attention span. </div>

 

[mi2again]

"f we ever build a large station we wouldn't need 15 launches to put up a football field size solar array,we would only need one or two to send up a reactor.."<br /><br />That is only because the shuttle, there will be other options. Also again, the reactor needs large radiators which are as big as solar arrays

 

[scottb50]

Without knowing the electrical connections and routing from what I saw there is an obvious tear between individual cells and crumpling of others, but nothing wide spread, so far. It is possible one out of many individual cells may be compromised and others may have reduced capability, due to their orientation. <br /><br />That is unless they are wired like the old Christmas tree lights, loose one and the whole string is out. Perhaps the best idea would be putting someone out there watching the deploy of each panel so it can be stopped if it has a problem. As long as it is restricted to one or two panels I would think it would be a minor problem.<br /><br />The other side of that is, I believe they intend to move this array again, maybe it would be better to wait until it's in it's final location before doing anything. Also how feasible would it be to take an array up as cargo and switch it out? I would think it would fit in a Progress or maybe even a Soyus. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>

 

[bobblebob]

To take just one or 2 panels up and replace them? i would of thought impossile as the crew wouldnt have anything to grapple onto near the array?

 

[JonClarke]

<i>Also again, the reactor needs large radiators which are as big as solar arrays.</i><br /><br />Many people forget that. they also forget that a reactor large enough to produce the power that the ISS does would have not either several km away on a long, heavy rigid beam, or you will need tonnes of shielding. Either it is a much heavier solution.<br /><br />Plus reactors are not full reliable. You need backup, either another reactor or solar arrays. if you need back solar power you might as well use them for all the power needs. They are simpler, more easily serviced, and more reliable. How do you service a faulty reactor in Earth orbit?<br /><br />And this is not even starting on the disposal issues.<br /><br />Jon <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><em>Whether we become a multi-planet species with unlimited horizons, or are forever confined to Earth will be decided in the twenty-first century amid the vast plains, rugged canyons and lofty mountains of Mars</em>  Arthur Clarke</p> </div>

 

[bobblebob]

The solar panels seem to have caused a few problems now both with retracting and deloying. All seem to come down to these guidewires. Is their some design issue hear the Nasa need to learn from?

 

[thereiwas]

Here is something they seem not to have thought of. Rotate the bad panel's SARJ so the damaged portion is out in front, where the orbiter is docked. Then have the orbiter use its boom extension to get a camera up really close to the damaged area. Probably get a better view than they have so far.

 

[MeteorWayne]

I think they have a good enough view from the hundreds of pictures they've take to understand what is going on.<br /><br />How to deal with it is a much more difficult issue. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font color="#000080"><em><font color="#000000">But the Krell forgot one thing John. Monsters. Monsters from the Id.</font></em> </font></p><p><font color="#000080">I really, really, really, really miss the "first unread post" function</font><font color="#000080"> </font></p> </div>

 

[bobblebob]

I dont see how you can deal with it really. If replacing individual panels is out of the question, its probably just a matter of finding out what the damage will have on power generation of the array. Dont see how you can fix a tear in an array

 

[MeteorWayne]

That seems right to me. I would imagine that even if the panel can't be repaired, it will need to be "fixed" in the sense you can't allow the unequal loads that would exist when you rotated the array to persist, or it might cause a break of the outside power return path.<br />That would kill half the array. Right now it's putting out 97% of the power; they can live with that as long as they can assure it won't get worse. That has to be the priority. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font color="#000080"><em><font color="#000000">But the Krell forgot one thing John. Monsters. Monsters from the Id.</font></em> </font></p><p><font color="#000080">I really, really, really, really miss the "first unread post" function</font><font color="#000080"> </font></p> </div>