<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'> Great info, thanks Wayne. I missed the briefing today.The issue with the SARJ scares me. This phrase in paticular " breaks irretrievably" puts a lump in my throat.Am I right that this could limit crew size? I don't think I'm the only one who has really been looking forward to 6+ on the station. side note: I seriously did a "spit take" when I read "thunder box". Haven't heard that one before...lol. Thanks earth_bound_misfit <br />Posted by thor06</DIV><br /><br />Just to clarify, the "breaks irretrievably" words were mine, no one aver said those words, or I would have put it in quotes. It is the impression, that they will try and use the current ring (or raceway) as long as possible until they understand the root cause of the problem. They don't want to switch to the other ring until they have to. One such circumstance would be if it really broke or locked up. Once they understand it, they may indeed switch to the other ring if that is indicated, but if they do that, there is no backup. So wait as long as possible, and baby this one along while troubleshooting/repair goes on.</p><p>That would cause serious power problems for the ISS, limiting how much work could be done, and future power consuming modules could be installed.</p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font color="#000080"><em><font color="#000000">But the Krell forgot one thing John. Monsters. Monsters from the Id.</font></em> </font></p><p><font color="#000080">I really, really, really, really miss the "first unread post" function</font><font color="#000080"> </font></p> </div>